75 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 4
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · December 16, 2010
Certainteed Corporation v. Dexter (2010)
…Premises Owner Liability; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Electric plant (Mount Vernon), Mount Vernon pipefitter General Electric plant (Mount Vernon) Mount Vernon 1969-1971; pipefitter 1963-1964; pipefitter 1946-1984
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 1, 2019 · in the opinion
Noll v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2019)
…INC., successor by merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION; CONWED CORPORATION; DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC; HERCULES INCORPORATED…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2016 · in the opinion
Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)
…suppliers "to develop expertise regarding a multitude of different end-products and to investigate the actual use of raw materials by manufacturers over whom the supplier has no control." (Ibid.) Artiglio v. General Electric Co., supra…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 21, 2019
Leavitt v. Rogers Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Worksites: Square D manufacturing plant; General Electric Schenectady Works; Square D plant, Cedar Rapids; General Electric facility, Schenectady security analyst Square D plant Cedar Rapids 1969-1975; security analyst General Electric facility Schenectady 1969-mid-1980s
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Noll v. American Biltrite Inc. (2017)
…Viacom Inc., successor-by-merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Certain-Teed Corporation; Conwed Corporation; Domco Products Texas Inc.; Ford Motor Company; General Electric Company; Georgia-Pacific LLC; Hercules…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion
Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)
…cite the cases of Toppi v. United States, 332 F.Supp. 513 (E.D.Pa.1971) and Lockett v. General Electric Co., 376 F.Supp. 1201 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff'd, 511 F.2d 1394 …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Klopman-Baerselman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…A. Rubin, SOHA & LANG PS & Todd N. Wade, HAWKINS PARNELL & YOUNG LLP, pro hac vice. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation & General Electric Company, a New York corporation, Defendants, represented by Christopher S. Marks, TANENBAUM…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion
Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)
…a duty to warn of dangers inherent in maintaining and repairing the manufacturer's products, do not persuade us to the contrary. Bich v. General Electric Co., 27 Wash.App. 25, 614 P.2d 1323 (1980)…
-
Asbestos type
Crocidolite: Blue Asbestos, the Deadliest Type
…Stiefken Heat vulcanizable polysiloxane compositions containing asbestos (US Patent 3,715,329, 1973), General Electric Co High speed sorting (US Patent 3,712,469, 1973), Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd Method for dispersing asbestos fibers (US…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · June 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)
…units are General Electric boiling water reactors. They produce electricity by splitting uranium atoms, and the heat generated by that process boils water, producing steam that is piped to turbines, which spin generators to produce electricity.…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · September 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Hayden v. Cut-Zaven, Ltd. (2020)
…hair dryers while working for Employers: Conair "Pro Style," Clairol "Son of a Gun," and "General Electric Power Turbo." He testified he believed asbestos was used around the hair dryer coils as a heat-reduction mechanism…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)
…Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 118 S.Ct. 512, 139 L.Ed.2d 508…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 10, 2013
Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2013)
The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's judgment notwithstanding the verdict for Special Electric and directed that the original judgment on the jury's verdict for the Webbs be reinstated, with one justice dissenting…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)
…BACKGROUND According to the general allegations of the operative fourth amended complaint, David was then a 54-year-old male with mesothelioma who was environmentally exposed as a bystander to asbestos fibers supplied by Special Electric…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Melendrez v. Superior Court OF State OF California (2013)
…subd. (b).) The reason for this waiver should be obvious. As a general matter, when an individual verifies discovery responses, further discovery can be directed to that individual to determine the sources for the initial responses…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2023 · in the opinion
Dusto v. Rogers Corporation (2023)
…179-80. In Connecticut, the legislature enacted workers' compensation legislation that included a broad exclusivity provision with no express exceptions for intentional torts of the employer. See General Statutes § 31-284 (a). The legislature also elected…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2003 · in the opinion
Dekens v. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (2003)
…2d 916.) Centaur Manufacturing made a plastic plumbing pipe that was approved for listing by IAPMO in 1984 and 1985. (FNS Mortgage Service Corp. v. Pacific General Group, Inc., supra, 24 Cal.App.4th at p…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion
Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)
…The court explained that the employer was a "sophisticated organization" and it did not have to be "told that gasoline is volatile and that sparks from an electrical connection or friction can cause ignition." (Ibid.) Subsequently…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion
Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)
…appropriate. Appellants assert that a determination as to whether there was insufficient knowledge of the manufacturer or of the scientific field in general would have been relevant in order to determine whether the Kent cigarettes, and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Agco Corp. (2013)
…\[and\] ... an implied restriction of the general authority is necessary to avoid grave interference with the performance of a governmental function, or that for other reasons it was plainly the purpose of Congress to use the…