No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Company document · Union Carbide documents · March 9, 2001 · page 37

    Amoco Corporation's Answers to Robert Henry Villarreal's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Admissions, with Cover Letters and Certificate (2001)

    In the document: …2000-05-1962-C; Robert Henry Villarreal, et al. v. Owens Corning, Fiberglas Corporation, ei al.; In the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas Dear Counsel: Enclosed, please find Amoco Corporation DEFENDANTS' ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFFS…

  2. Company document · Union Carbide documents · July 2000

    Union Carbide Chemical & Plastics Co., Inc.'s Responses to Plaintiffs' Request for Disclosure, Campbell et al. v. Owens Corning et al. (2000)

    Union Carbide Chemical & Plastics Co., Inc.'s responses to a Request for Disclosure in Campbell et al. v. Owens Corning et al., No. 4886RM98, 149th Judicial District, Brazoria County, Texas. The filing has a signature page…

  3. Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 24, 2001

    Union Carbide Corporation's Objections and Answers to George F. Kutach's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Rutherford v. Owens-Corning (2001)

    Union Carbide's written objections and answers to plaintiff George F. Kutach's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission in Cause No. 99-06746-K (Dallas County, Texas), limited to Union Carbide's Seadrift facility. It…

  4. Company document · Union Carbide documents · March 12, 2001 · page 22

    Union Carbide's Answers to Interrogatories, Responses to Requests for Production and Admissions in Villarreal v. GAF Corporation, Cameron County, Texas (2001)

    In the document: …materials pertaining to the Brownsville facilities safety policies. Please refer to the documents produced in Eleodoro Levrier, et al. vs. Owens Corning Corporation, et al.; Cause No. 99-05-02148-E; In the 357" District Court…