No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …in a manner that could not reasonably be foreseen by the defendant" bars recovery where such misuse proximately caused the injury. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 721 n.14 (4th Cir…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …a large number of Powell valves at the refinery. \[4\] See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150, at [\2] (4th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (unpublished) (applying Lohrmann to North Carolina…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Barkley v. 4520 Corp., Inc. (2022)

    …has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)

    …For instance, Appellant cites Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, where we affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of causation. See 69 F.3d at 716…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods., Inc., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (quoting and applying Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2018)

    …a personal injury asbestos case \\[to\] prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 11, 2019 · in the opinion

    Smith v. 3M Company (2019)

    …product' containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 & n.2 (4th Cir. 1995) (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)

    …that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 & n.2 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the threshold causation standard outlined in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods., Inc., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · June 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Bantin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …Accordingly, a plaintiff "must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 & n.2 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the threshold causation standard outlined in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC (2021)

    …1985) ("We agree ... that at trial plaintiff's evidence must demonstrate that he was actually exposed to the alleged offending products."); see also Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods., Inc., 69 F.3d 712…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    Queen v. CBS Corporation (2017)

    …at 1162-63. This is consistent with the requirements of North Carolina law. See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 n.2 (4th Cir. 1995) (finding Lohrmann consistent with North Carolina…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024 · in the opinion

    Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)

    …test"—to evaluate proximate causation in asbestos cases arising under North Carolina law. See, e.g., Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824 (table), 1995 WL 417731, at [\3] (4th Cir. July 6…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" (quoting Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury." Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …answers are referenced in this opinion as coming from Firestone, since that is where Mr. Finch worked. \[2\] Kaylo is a form of pipe insulation that Owens-Corning manufactured. Docs. 306-7 at 84; 317-1…

  20. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion

    In re Aldrich Pump LLC (2023)

    …Trust. Meanwhile, each Debtor owns an operating subsidiary and has a business of sorts—managing the tens of thousands of asbestos litigation claims against them. See Declaration of Allen Tananbaum in support of Debtor's Objection.…