17 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · February 6, 2003
Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2003)
Janet Murphy, who lived outside South Carolina when she was diagnosed, sued E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and other defendants in South Carolina, and her husband David sued for loss of consortium. She was diagnosed with mesothelioma in July…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · June 11, 2001
Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2001)
Janet Murphy, a Virginia resident, and her husband David sued Du Pont, Rapid American and other companies in South Carolina. She alleged she developed mesothelioma from asbestos fibers carried home on her father's clothing. Her father, Dr. Charles…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)
Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the plaintiffs showed evidence of frequent and regular exposure where they were exposed to asbestos dust on a daily basis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…plaintiffs have raised a genuine dispute as to whether Sparkman was exposed to asbestos from his work with and around a Research-Cottrell precipitator on a frequent and regular basis. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007 · in the opinion
Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)
…a resident of South Carolina, the trial court focused on whether the cause of action arose in South Carolina, relying on Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 346 S.C. 37, 550 S.E.2d 589…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)
…v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation. Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc., 373 S.C. 179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69…
-
Exposure sites · South Carolina
South Carolina Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage
…list of its own; every site on the other trusts' lists qualifies Babcock & Wilcox: 394 entries (industrial and utility boilers) Owens Corning: 341 entries (Kaylo and high-temperature pipe and block insulation) A.P. Green: 192…
-
State law · South Carolina
South Carolina Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation
…Fibreboard, GAF, NARCO, Owens Corning, Owens-Illinois). Mill employees have workers' compensation against International Paper, not a lawsuit, but they can still bring trust claims and product claims against the companies that made the asbestos products…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion
Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)
…in law to be the proximate result of the first wrongful cause.'" 415 S.C. at 590-91, 784 S.E.2d at 676 (emphasis added) (quoting Wallace v. Owens-Ill., Inc., 300 S.C. 518…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2019)
…698 S.E.2d 835, 838 (Ct. App. 2010) ("Unfair prejudice means an undue tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis." (quoting State v. Owens, 346 S.C. 637, 666, 552 S.E.2d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)
…above, the Conner court relied heavily on the Lindstrom decision in concluding that a manufacturer owes no duty to warn with respect to "asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." See Conner, 842…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)
…rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Metal Masters, Inc. (2022)
…ECF No. 1.) Amerisure filed the instant declaratory judgment action against Metal Masters and Weist on November 10, 2021, seeking a declaration that it owes no coverage obligation for the Weist Verdict. (Compl. ECF No. 1…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Bostic v. 3M Company (2018)
…statute has "consistently been held to require complete diversity of citizenship. That is, diversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different State from each plaintiff." Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · July 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2024)
…owned by or rented to the named insured." The exclusion thus contemplates a situation where the insured manufactures or distributes products at a facility it owns or rents and the injury occurs away from that facility…