No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

33 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's orders staying the Hansens' California asbestos actions against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and others on forum non conveniens grounds, so the plaintiffs lost and were directed to file…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995

    Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …judgment for plaintiff Sarah Kirk against Owens-Corning and remanded for a new trial on damages and liability, because the district court refused to strike two biased jurors for cause, impairing Owens-Corning's peremptory challenges…

  3. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991 · in the opinion

    Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    …when it sold its Kaylo division to Owens-Corning Fiberglass. It has not manufactured or distributed any product containing asbestos since then. The parties stipulated that Owens-Illinois was not liable for exposure to Kaylo occurring…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 682 A…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Boeing Company (2022)

    …claims, and therefore did not interrupt prescription with respect to these claims." Both parties consider a 1996 district court opinion to be helpful to their arguments. See Lagan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., No. 80-4338…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Union Carbide's reliance on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 is similarly unavailing. In Dumin, the plaintiff could not establish…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Hilbert v. Aeroquip, Inc. (2007)

    …Hilbert has attempted to avoid removal by narrowing his complaint. See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653, 658 (E.D.Tex.1999) ("once a defendant properly removes a case to federal…

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion

    Scearce v. 3M Company (2013)

    …federal defense; and 4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · October 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Papp v. Fore-Kast Sales Co., Inc. (2014)

    …will closely examine and construe the Amended Complaint in determining whether Boeing's removal petition properly establishes the existence of federal jurisdiction. See Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 128 (3d Cir…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …enough to establish joint tortfeasor status. Jacobs v. Flynn, 131 Md.App. 342, 374-75, 749 A.2d 174 (2000). See Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 531-32, 682 A.2d 1143 …

  12. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bowser v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)

    …regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked."\[23\] At least one federal circuit decision, Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., applied Lohrmann's so-called "frequency, regularity…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)

    …the USN approved reasonably precise specifications that prevented UTC from complying with its state-law duty to warn for purposes of the Boyle government contractor defense. See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F. Supp…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 15, 2023 · in the opinion

    Warrington v. 3M Company (2023)

    …any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'" Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 30, 1983 · in the opinion

    Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc. (1983)

    …indemnity suit by asbestos manufacturer against the government for, inter alia, designing and specifying asbestos insulation products and failing to inspect the workplaces); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Western District of…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1984 · in the opinion

    Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …for plaintiff-appellee. [\464] Robert S. Rooth, New Orleans, La., for amicus curiae Owens-Illinois, Inc. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges. POLITZ, Circuit Judge: This Louisiana diversity case occasions an examination of…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)

    …FLOORING, INC.; LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP.; METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; NORTH AMERICAN AVIATION DEV., LLC; NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP.; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; PNEUMO ABEX LLC; PRATT & WHITNEY ENGINE SERVICES, INC.; UNION CARBIDE CORP.; UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendants…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia · April 20, 2009 · in the opinion

    Hamrick v. A & I Company (2009)

    …LEARJET, INC. and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION f/k/a Martin Marietta Corporation and MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY a/k/a Metropolitan Insurance Company and NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION and OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)

    …duty); Van Fossen v. MidAmerican Energy Co., 777 N.W.2d 689, 697 (Iowa 2009) (applying Iowa law and finding no duty); Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 705 A.2d 58, 66 (Md. Ct. Spec. App…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · October 27, 2015 · in the opinion

    Sequira v. 3M Company (2015)

    …exposure. Sequira didn't offer competent expert evidence showing that the asbestos from the Pratt & Whitney engines was a "substantial factor" in causing his mesothelioma. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203, 1219…