No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

52 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 3

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 18, 2000

    Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …court's judgments, upholding the denial of new trials, so the estates of Beckmann and Rogers lost and Owens-Corning won. Under Kentucky's apportionment statute, fault may be apportioned only to parties, dismissed or settling…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's orders staying the Hansens' California asbestos actions against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and others on forum non conveniens grounds, so the plaintiffs lost and were directed to file…

  3. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991 · in the opinion

    Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    …when it sold its Kaylo division to Owens-Corning Fiberglass. It has not manufactured or distributed any product containing asbestos since then. The parties stipulated that Owens-Illinois was not liable for exposure to Kaylo occurring…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Boeing Company (2022)

    …claims, and therefore did not interrupt prescription with respect to these claims." Both parties consider a 1996 district court opinion to be helpful to their arguments. See Lagan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., No. 80-4338…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Union Carbide's reliance on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 is similarly unavailing. In Dumin, the plaintiff could not establish…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Hilbert v. Aeroquip, Inc. (2007)

    …Hilbert has attempted to avoid removal by narrowing his complaint. See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653, 658 (E.D.Tex.1999) ("once a defendant properly removes a case to federal…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …trigger strict liability for that product's defect. As already stressed, liability for product defects "is not absolute." (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 994.) The imposition of liability must…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bartolone v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)

    …Ltd. (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 651; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1188.) Union Carbide does not address these cases with any specificity, but only refers to plaintiffs' reliance…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 23, 2010 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …there is no causation. (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin).) "Plaintiffs may prove causation in an asbestos case by demonstrating that the plaintiff's or decedent's exposure…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …employer had no liability for plaintiff's injuries beyond payment of workers' compensation benefits\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1198 \[applied Proposition 51 to strict liability asbestos case\].) Defendant…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion

    Scearce v. 3M Company (2013)

    …federal defense; and 4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · October 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Papp v. Fore-Kast Sales Co., Inc. (2014)

    …will closely examine and construe the Amended Complaint in determining whether Boeing's removal petition properly establishes the existence of federal jurisdiction. See Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 128 (3d Cir…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …enough to establish joint tortfeasor status. Jacobs v. Flynn, 131 Md.App. 342, 374-75, 749 A.2d 174 (2000). See Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 531-32, 682 A.2d 1143 …

  15. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bowser v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)

    …regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked."\[23\] At least one federal circuit decision, Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., applied Lohrmann's so-called "frequency, regularity…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)

    …the USN approved reasonably precise specifications that prevented UTC from complying with its state-law duty to warn for purposes of the Boyle government contractor defense. See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F. Supp…

  17. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · October 24, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rich v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2012)

    …determined that "predecessor in interest" does not require privity. See, e.g., Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 4 F.3d 276, 283 (4th Cir. 1993) ("\[P\]rivity is not the gravamen of the analysis. Instead…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · October 9, 2015 · in the opinion

    Herr v. Linde LLC (2015)

    …he inhaled asbestos dust; rather, he must produce evidence tending to show that he inhaled asbestos produced by the defendant's product." Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 102 F.3d 1429, 1432 (7th Cir. 1996) …

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …No. 162-35. The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin has recently rejected Dr. Frank's rephrasing in Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 211 F.Supp.3d 1196, 1207 (W.D. Wis…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)

    …evidence of exposure to the defendant's asbestos. See Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 8 A.3d 725, 729 (Md. 2010); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 602 A.2d 1182, 1184 (Md. 1992). \[33\] This evidence…