13 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · June 27, 2022 · in the opinion
Bantin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…S. Inchon, Mr. Bantin served as an instructor at a correctional facility located in Great Lakes, Illinois until he was honorably discharged from the U.S. Navy in May of 1974. \[Bantin Trial Dep., Doc. 107…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC (2021)
…Catherine Basque Weiler, SWANSON, MARTIN & BELL, LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellee. Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by published PER CURIAM opinion. [\484] PER CURIAM: In 2016, Julian Jackson Smith was diagnosed with mesothelioma…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…the Fourth Circuit's frequency, regularity and proximity test. It found the evidence speculative and weaker than in Jones v. Owens-Corning. It declined to adopt a relaxed test for mesothelioma and granted Powell summary judgment.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…in a manner that could not reasonably be foreseen by the defendant" bars recovery where such misuse proximately caused the injury. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 721 n.14 (4th Cir…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…plaintiff "must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…case "must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024 · in the opinion
Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury." Prekler v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 60 F.3d 824…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · September 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Hinson v. Continental Tire the Americas (2019)
…were layered together and pressed in a tire-building machine..... The "green tires" were then transported to the curing department. There were 147 clam-shell-shaped curing presses/ovens in the curing department..... The curing process…