No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

17 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · February 6, 2003 · in the opinion

    Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2003)

    …both of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae Owens-Illinois, Inc. Justice PLEICONES: We granted certiorari to consider when a "cause of action shall have arisen ... within this State" under the Door Closing…

  2. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · June 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2001)

    …Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, all of Columbia; and Carl E. Pierce, II, of Charleston, for respondents. Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Owens-Illinois, Inc., R. Bruce Shaw and William C. Wood, Jr., both of Nelson, Mullins, Riley…

  3. Exposure sites · South Carolina

    South Carolina Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage

    …23 entries (pumps, compressors and oilfield equipment) Owens-Illinois: 21 entries (Kaylo pipe and block insulation) ACandS: 17 entries (insulation contracting) Pittsburgh Corning: 15 entries (Unibestos pipe insulation) Flintkote: 14 entries (roofing, flooring and building products…

  4. State law · South Carolina

    South Carolina Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …Fibreboard, GAF, NARCO, Owens Corning, Owens-Illinois). Mill employees have workers' compensation against International Paper, not a lawsuit, but they can still bring trust claims and product claims against the companies that made the asbestos products…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …frequency, regularity, and proximity test'" and consequently applying this causation test to mesothelioma case) (citing Henderson, 644 S.E.2d at 727); Blackmon v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 2011 WL 4790631, at [\1] n. (E.D. Pa…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …frequency, regularity, and proximity test'" and consequently applying this causation test to mesothelioma case) (citing Henderson, 644 S.E.2d at 727); Blackmon v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 2011 WL 4790631, at [\1] n. (E.D. Pa…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …frequency, regularity, and proximity test'" and consequently applying this causation test to mesothelioma case) (citing Henderson, 644 S.E.2d at 727); Blackmon v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 2011 WL 4790631, at [\1] n. (E.D. Pa…

  8. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)

    …in law to be the proximate result of the first wrongful cause.'" 415 S.C. at 590-91, 784 S.E.2d at 676 (emphasis added) (quoting Wallace v. Owens-Ill., Inc., 300 S.C. 518…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Metal Masters, Inc. (2022)

    …declaration that it owes no coverage obligation for the Weist Verdict. (Compl. ECF No. 1.) Continental filed a declaratory judgment action against its insureds, MDLZ and Kraft Heinz, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)

    Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the plaintiffs showed evidence of frequent and regular exposure where they were exposed to asbestos dust on a daily basis…

  11. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007 · in the opinion

    Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)

    …a resident of South Carolina, the trial court focused on whether the cause of action arose in South Carolina, relying on Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 346 S.C. 37, 550 S.E.2d 589…

  12. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion

    Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2019)

    …698 S.E.2d 835, 838 (Ct. App. 2010) ("Unfair prejudice means an undue tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis." (quoting State v. Owens, 346 S.C. 637, 666, 552 S.E.2d…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)

    …179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the Lohrmann test in…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion

    Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)

    …above, the Conner court relied heavily on the Lindstrom decision in concluding that a manufacturer owes no duty to warn with respect to "asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." See Conner, 842…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)

    …rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Bostic v. 3M Company (2018)

    …statute has "consistently been held to require complete diversity of citizenship. That is, diversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different State from each plaintiff." Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v…

  17. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · July 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2024)

    …owned by or rented to the named insured." The exclusion thus contemplates a situation where the insured manufactures or distributes products at a facility it owns or rents and the injury occurs away from that facility…