78 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 4
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 20, 1992
Baione v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1992)
The appellate court reversed the final judgment for Owens-Illinois, reinstated the plaintiff's strict liability counts and punitive damages claim, and remanded; the plaintiff got no retrial on negligence because she had not appealed that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · November 22, 1994
Perrin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)
The district court granted summary judgment to defendants Owens Illinois, Owens Corning and Fibreboard and third-party defendant Flintkote, and denied the Perrins' request to shift the burden of proof on causation. Under Iowa law, evidence…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 29, 1999 · in the opinion
Spain v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1999)
…Corporation, Raymark Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation, a Delaware [\529] Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., f/k/a Owens-Illinois Glass Company, an Ohio Corporation, Flinkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, and A.E. Staley Company…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996
Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)
…for the defendants in Giffear and reversed the plaintiffs' verdicts in Simmons and Murray, so Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard and Keene prevailed over the three plaintiff couples. Asymptomatic pleural thickening without physical impairment is not a compensable…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)
The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994
Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)
The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that the trial court correctly directed a verdict against Dumin on exposure to OCF Kaylo aboard the Pocono because the evidence was insufficient. Even…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 16, 1992
Bowers v. Fibreboard Corporation (1992)
The Court of Appeals affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs (the Eldredge and Williams estates and Mrs. Eldredge) against Fibreboard and Owens-Illinois, finding no error in the jury instruction or the evidence rulings; Celotex…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 2, 1993
Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. (1993)
The Eighth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for all defendants (Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard, Keene, Anchor, Chesterton, Garlock, John Crane, Rexnord and Georgia Talc) against the ten Mohawk tire plant workers, because the workers lacked sufficient…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013
Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)
James Joyner, a 22-year Coast Guard veteran who had earlier worked as an electrician's assistant at the Charleston Navy Shipyard, was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in March 2012. He sued several asbestos product makers and others in Baltimore…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 4, 2015
Brady v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
Plaintiffs asked the New York County Supreme Court to consolidate thirteen asbestos cases for joint trial in two groups. All but one of the plaintiffs had lung cancer. Miceli and Ward had mesothelioma. Most had died, and Miller and Morgan were…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · June 13, 1985
Celotex Corp. v. Copeland (1985)
Lee Loyd Copeland and his wife sued sixteen asbestos product manufacturers. Copeland worked as a boilermaker from 1942 to 1975 on 50 to 100 jobs, and he developed asbestosis and an asbestos-related cancer. He said the products were mostly insulation…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co. (2015)
…LLC; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Honeywell International, Inc.; Railroad Friction Products Corporation; and Illinois Central. As of October 2013, the only defendant remaining in this case was Illinois Central. ¶ 4 On October 1…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 19, 2000 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Crown Cork & Seal (2000)
…Corp. Sharon Jeanne Glover, LeClair Ryan, Richmond, VA, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Fibreboard Corp. Robert L. O'Donnell, Vandeventer, Black, Meredith & Martin, Norfolk, VA, for Owens-Illinois, Inc. Carl Robert Schwertz, Duane & Shannon, P.C., Richmond…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion
Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)
…supra, 2 Cal.4th at p. 600.) Proposition 51 thus contemplates a defendant's fault will be "compared to all other \fault' responsible for the injury." (Richards v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 985…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion
Laverty v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2010)
…MANUFACTURING COMPANY, NEW YORK AIR BRAKE CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PECORA CORPORATION, RAILROAD FRICTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION, RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION, RILEY STOKER CORPORATION, ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC., RPM, INC., SPRINKMANN SONS CORPORATION OF ILLINOIS, SPRINKMANN SONS CORPORATION, T…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 10, 2010 · in the opinion
Simpkins v. CSX Corp. (2010)
…2008), offers a thoughtful and persuasive discussion of the role the parties' relationship should play in determining the existence of a duty, while the New Jersey case of Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…cause of the injuries, and (4) that the product was expected to and did reach the consumer without substantial change in its condition." Phipps, 363 A.2d at 958, quoted in Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)
…economic loss are matters entrusted to the wide discretion of the trial judge. In terms of the width, the virtually boundless width, of "wide discretion," as recently as 1992 Owens-Illinois v. Zenobia, 325 Md. 420…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Amato v. Bell & Gossett (2015)
…Honeywell, Inc., Ingersoll Rand Company, John Crane, Inc., Keeler/Dorr-Oliver Boiler Co., Marley Cooling Tower, Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pecora Corp., Riley Stoker Corp., SEPCO Corporation, Inc., Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., f…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
…properly attributed to the plaintiff, other defendants, or nonparties to the action. (See Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 476 \[38 Cal.Rptr.2d 739\] (Sparks).) Here, the special verdict form…