No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

285 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 15

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 26, 2005

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)

    The Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the judgment for the Gianottis against Owens-Illinois, holding that the damages cap did not apply, the loss of consortium claim could proceed, the release reserved the mesothelioma claim…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · May 21, 1990

    Kreppein v. Owens-Illinois (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1990)

    The court granted Owens-Illinois' motion for reconsideration, held the widow's claims against it barred by collateral estoppel, and vacated the judgment as to it; it denied the JNOV, new trial and remittitur motions of…

  3. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 15, 1994

    Davies v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1994)

    The appellate court reversed the final judgment for Owens-Illinois after a jury verdict and remanded for a new trial, because excluding the Ames deposition was an abuse of discretion that favored the plaintiff, Frances Davies…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · June 30, 1992

    Feldman v. Owens-Illinois (In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation, 1992)

    Workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, and families of those who died, sued makers of asbestos insulation products for diseases including lung cancer, colon cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, pleural disease and asbestosis. The jury, in a joint…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · September 30, 2016

    Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)

    …the court entered judgment for Owens-Illinois and dismissed the estate's claims because plaintiff Gary Suoja did not prove Oswald Suoja was exposed to Owens-Illinois Kaylo or that any such exposure substantially caused his…

  6. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 24, 2006

    Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2006)

    …so plaintiff Olivo's claim continued. A landowner that owes a duty to workers on its premises for the foreseeable risk of asbestos exposure also owes a derivative duty to a spouse who handles the worker…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · November 12, 1992

    Becht v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    The Sixth Circuit affirmed the judgment for plaintiff Ann Becht against Owens-Corning, holding it was not entitled to workers' compensation immunity and that the jury's 40% fault allocation and the denial of a new…

  8. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 24, 2000

    Carroll v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …s lung cancer claim was not time-barred, which favors the plaintiff over the asbestos defendants (Owens-Corning and others). Asbestosis and lung cancer are separate and distinct diseases, so a cause of action for lung…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …s liability findings and compensatory awards for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and Porter Hayden, but reversed the $1.5 million punitive damages award against Owens-Corning in the Scruggs case. A bystander's…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 29, 1999 · in the opinion

    Spain v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1999)

    …Corporation, Raymark Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation, a Delaware [\529] Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., f/k/a Owens-Illinois Glass Company, an Ohio Corporation, Flinkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, and A.E. Staley Company…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986

    Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    The Ninth Circuit reversed the judgment entered on a jury verdict for Owens-Illinois and remanded for a new trial, ruling for Kisor's estate, because the district court wrongly admitted evidence of the manufacturer's…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 25, 1993

    Dempsey v. Pacor, Inc. (1993)

    The Superior Court vacated the judgments entered for the six plaintiff couples against Owens-Illinois, Keene and Fibreboard and remanded for a new trial on damages only, with no fear or increased-risk-of-cancer elements…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020

    Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)

    …Owens-Illinois was liable for Dr. Gaddy's asbestos exposure at International Paper. A jury verdict may be set aside under Rule 50(b) only if no reasonable jury could have found otherwise. Testimony that Owens…

  15. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 2, 1994

    Atkinson v. Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …no manifest error or abuse of discretion, so the nine plaintiffs who appealed (or their heirs) and Faye Myers did not get higher damages or a consortium award against Owens-Illinois, Keene and INA. A jury…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996

    Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)

    …for the defendants in Giffear and reversed the plaintiffs' verdicts in Simmons and Murray, so Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard and Keene prevailed over the three plaintiff couples. Asymptomatic pleural thickening without physical impairment is not a compensable…

  17. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · December 19, 2019

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2019)

    The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the appellate court's reinstatement of the civil conspiracy claims against Owens-Illinois and Pneumo Abex and remanded to the appellate court to review the circuit court's summary judgment for…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    Bowes told Gardner that Owens-Illinois currently had "in the pilot plant stage" a new type of thermal insulation, "a hydrous calcium silicate," that, when removed from a mold and dried, formed "a porous mass \[that…

  19. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  20. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 10, 2018

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2018)

    The appellate court reversed the trial court's summary judgment for Pneumo Abex and Owens-Illinois on the civil conspiracy claims and remanded for further proceedings, ruling for plaintiffs John and Deborah Jones. At summary judgment…