No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

193 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 10

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 26, 1990

    Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1990)

    …Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of about $450,000 for the widow, Edna Raney, against Owens-Illinois, Celotex and Raymark, holding the evidence let the jury find the missing asbestos warnings were a proximate…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · September 30, 2016

    Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)

    …the court entered judgment for Owens-Illinois and dismissed the estate's claims because plaintiff Gary Suoja did not prove Oswald Suoja was exposed to Owens-Illinois Kaylo or that any such exposure substantially caused his…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 18, 1993

    Srite v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993)

    The court of appeals affirmed the jury's zero past-damages awards for the workers and wives against Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard, Pittsburgh-Corning and Keene, but reversed the limitations bar against the Spikes plaintiffs and reversed…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 24, 2006

    Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2006)

    …so plaintiff Olivo's claim continued. A landowner that owes a duty to workers on its premises for the foreseeable risk of asbestos exposure also owes a derivative duty to a spouse who handles the worker…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · November 12, 1992

    Becht v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    The Sixth Circuit affirmed the judgment for plaintiff Ann Becht against Owens-Corning, holding it was not entitled to workers' compensation immunity and that the jury's 40% fault allocation and the denial of a new…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · April 23, 1998

    Strickland v. Owens Corning (1998)

    The Sixth Circuit held the district court abused its discretion in denying Owens Corning's new-trial/remittitur motion and remanded for a remittitur reducing the judgment to no more than $883,731 (50% fault), failing…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …s liability findings and compensatory awards for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and Porter Hayden, but reversed the $1.5 million punitive damages award against Owens-Corning in the Scruggs case. A bystander's…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 13, 1982

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1982)

    Ten insulation workers or their survivors sued makers of asbestos insulation in federal court in Wisconsin. Two of the workers died of mesothelioma, and the other eight have asbestosis. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing the…

  9. Court case · Wisconsin Supreme Court · October 27, 1999

    Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's order dismissing the Sophas' mesothelioma action against Owens-Corning and the other defendants as time-barred, and remanded for further proceedings. A diagnosis of a non-malignant…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Evelyn Ruckstuhl and her husband Richard sued several companies in Louisiana state court. They alleged she was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 1996 from asbestos exposure in two ways: dust on her husband's work clothes from the Baton Rouge…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986

    Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    The Ninth Circuit reversed the judgment entered on a jury verdict for Owens-Illinois and remanded for a new trial, ruling for Kisor's estate, because the district court wrongly admitted evidence of the manufacturer's…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 25, 1993

    Dempsey v. Pacor, Inc. (1993)

    The Superior Court vacated the judgments entered for the six plaintiff couples against Owens-Illinois, Keene and Fibreboard and remanded for a new trial on damages only, with no fear or increased-risk-of-cancer elements…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020

    Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)

    …Owens-Illinois was liable for Dr. Gaddy's asbestos exposure at International Paper. A jury verdict may be set aside under Rule 50(b) only if no reasonable jury could have found otherwise. Testimony that Owens…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 2, 1994

    Atkinson v. Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …no manifest error or abuse of discretion, so the nine plaintiffs who appealed (or their heirs) and Faye Myers did not get higher damages or a consortium award against Owens-Illinois, Keene and INA. A jury…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996

    Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)

    …for the defendants in Giffear and reversed the plaintiffs' verdicts in Simmons and Murray, so Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard and Keene prevailed over the three plaintiff couples. Asymptomatic pleural thickening without physical impairment is not a compensable…

  16. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    Two long-time employees of the American Cyanamid plant, Robert Sholtis and Sam Lee, sued asbestos manufacturers and suppliers. Sholtis died at 65 of pleural asbestosis. He had worked as a mill operator, maintenance laborer, pipefitter's helper and…

  17. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · March 25, 1991

    Landrigan v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Division, set aside the directed verdict for Owens-Corning and Owens Illinois, and remanded for retrial, so plaintiff Angelina Landrigan won. Under Rubanick, an expert's causation opinion…

  18. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 6, 1996

    Viereck v. Fibreboard Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment on the jury verdict for Virgil Viereck's estate and his wife Julia Viereck against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that pre-WPLA law applied and that the evidentiary rulings…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 8, 1991

    Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1991)

    The Second Circuit reversed the judgment for the plaintiff against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, because the revival statute's exception applied. Under New York's 1986…

  20. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 16, 1991

    Fibreboard Corp. v. Pool (1991)

    Five workers at the Texas Eastman plant in Longview, Texas, or their families sued Fibreboard, Owens-Illinois, Celotex, Flintkote and Garlock, claiming the companies failed to warn of asbestos dangers. The workers were insulators or maintenance…