No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

160 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 8

  1. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 20, 1992

    Baione v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1992)

    The appellate court reversed the final judgment for Owens-Illinois, reinstated the plaintiff's strict liability counts and punitive damages claim, and remanded; the plaintiff got no retrial on negligence because she had not appealed that…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 6, 2016

    Ney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)

    …at Bethlehem Steel from 1948 to 1953. A co-worker named only Owens-Illinois's Kaylo pipe covering and Quigley's Insulag spray as asbestos products at that site. Plaintiff sought documents and a corporate witness…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · November 22, 1994

    Perrin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    The district court granted summary judgment to defendants Owens Illinois, Owens Corning and Fibreboard and third-party defendant Flintkote, and denied the Perrins' request to shift the burden of proof on causation. Under Iowa law, evidence…

  4. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the appellate court and the jury verdicts for the three plaintiffs, and ordered judgment entered for Owens Corning and Owens-Illinois because the evidence did not prove a civil conspiracy. Parallel…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 11, 1998

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    The appellate court affirmed the jury verdicts for plaintiffs Bicknell, Thacker and McClure against Owens Corning Fiberglas and (in McClure) Owens-Illinois, and remanded only so the trial court could apply setoffs for settlements with other…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 14, 1997 · in the opinion

    Van Winkle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …Administrator of the Estate of Donald Van Winkle, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee (Illinois Central Railroad Company, Defendant). Mark HICKS as Special Administrator of the…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996

    Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)

    …for the defendants in Giffear and reversed the plaintiffs' verdicts in Simmons and Murray, so Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard and Keene prevailed over the three plaintiff couples. Asymptomatic pleural thickening without physical impairment is not a compensable…

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994

    Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that the trial court correctly directed a verdict against Dumin on exposure to OCF Kaylo aboard the Pocono because the evidence was insufficient. Even…

  10. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991

    Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    …directing judgment for Owens-Illinois and remanding for a new trial against Fibreboard because the plaintiffs' proof of causation was insufficient. A plaintiff must show through expert testimony that each defendant's product was a substantial…

  11. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 16, 1992

    Bowers v. Fibreboard Corporation (1992)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs (the Eldredge and Williams estates and Mrs. Eldredge) against Fibreboard and Owens-Illinois, finding no error in the jury instruction or the evidence rulings; Celotex…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 2, 1993

    Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. (1993)

    The Eighth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for all defendants (Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard, Keene, Anchor, Chesterton, Garlock, John Crane, Rexnord and Georgia Talc) against the ten Mohawk tire plant workers, because the workers lacked sufficient…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997

    Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)

    …reversed the judgment against Hopeman Brothers. It otherwise affirmed the judgments for the plaintiffs against Anchor and Owens-Corning. The Maryland cap on noneconomic damages applies to asbestos wrongful death claims arising after October 1, 1994…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013

    Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)

    James Joyner, a 22-year Coast Guard veteran who had earlier worked as an electrician's assistant at the Charleston Navy Shipyard, was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in March 2012. He sued several asbestos product makers and others in Baltimore…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 4, 2015

    Brady v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    Plaintiffs asked the New York County Supreme Court to consolidate thirteen asbestos cases for joint trial in two groups. All but one of the plaintiffs had lung cancer. Miceli and Ward had mesothelioma. Most had died, and Miller and Morgan were…

  16. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · June 13, 1985

    Celotex Corp. v. Copeland (1985)

    Lee Loyd Copeland and his wife sued sixteen asbestos product manufacturers. Copeland worked as a boilermaker from 1942 to 1975 on 50 to 100 jobs, and he developed asbestosis and an asbestos-related cancer. He said the products were mostly insulation…

  17. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · June 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2001)

    …Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, all of Columbia; and Carl E. Pierce, II, of Charleston, for respondents. Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Owens-Illinois, Inc., R. Bruce Shaw and William C. Wood, Jr., both of Nelson, Mullins, Riley…

  18. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · April 13, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …dissent. \[\\] Kimball, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3. \[1\] The other eight defendants are Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, The Babcock & Wilcox Company, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Rapid American…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 19, 2000 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Crown Cork & Seal (2000)

    …Corp. Sharon Jeanne Glover, LeClair Ryan, Richmond, VA, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Fibreboard Corp. Robert L. O'Donnell, Vandeventer, Black, Meredith & Martin, Norfolk, VA, for Owens-Illinois, Inc. Carl Robert Schwertz, Duane & Shannon, P.C., Richmond…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)

    …supra, 2 Cal.4th at p. 600.) Proposition 51 thus contemplates a defendant's fault will be "compared to all other \fault' responsible for the injury." (Richards v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 985…