No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017

    Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)

    The district court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation and granted the unopposed summary judgment motions of CBS, Crane, Union Carbide, Ingersoll Rand, FMC, McNally and Western Auto Supply against plaintiffs Icom and Johanna Evans. Under…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 20, 2019

    Mosher v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The magistrate judge recommended granting Air & Liquid Systems Corporation's (successor to Buffalo Pumps) motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs Kent and Cathy Mosher because the evidence did not show its pump was a substantial factor…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 28, 2016

    Hillyer v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation Hillyer, 2016)

    …BW/IP, Eaton, Union Carbide and Gould against the Hillyers, who did not oppose the motions. Under maritime law, a plaintiff must show exposure to the defendant's own asbestos-containing product that was a substantial…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 19, 2019

    Mosher v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Pfizer, Siemens, Union Carbide and Warren Pumps) against plaintiffs Kent and Cathy Mosher, who did not respond to the motions. Under maritime law and Colorado law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's asbestos…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hillyer v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …Inc., Defendant, represented by Antoinette D. Hubbard, Maron Marvel Bradley & Anderson LLC & Paul A. Bradley, Maron Marvel Bradley & Anderson LLC. Union Carbide Corporation, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC & Joseph S. Naylor, Swartz…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)

    …liability claim, federal courts have subsequently recognized the applicability of the defense to state law failure to warn clams. See, e.g., \McQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del. Dec. 13…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil Action No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 21, 2017 · in the opinion

    Tallman v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil Action No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Cox v. Foster Wheeler (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)

    …512 (1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., Mac Queen v. Union Carbide Corp., C.A. No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)

    …based on sufficient facts or data for purposes of Fed. R. Evid. 702. Both Plaintiff and JCI rely on the court's decision in MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., 246 F. Supp. 3d 1004 (D. Del…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion

    Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …E; Ex. F) The court recommends granting Amdura's motion for summary judgment because Mr. Pruitt provides insufficient evidence of product identification. See MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., C.A. No. 13-831-SLR, 246 F…

  12. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Gordon v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)

    …Moon characterized Gordon's efforts as verbal discussions about the work and testified that union rules would have prevented Gordon from handling the equipment himself.\[21\] The record leaves room for doubt as to whether Gordon…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion

    Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)

    …A., 40 F.3d 622, 631 (3d Cir. 1994); see also Earles v. Union Barge Line Corp., 486 F.2d 1097, 1102 (3d Cir. 1973). "Maritime law has incorporated the doctrines of strict liability and negligence…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 8, 2021 · in the opinion

    Carnes v. General Dynamics Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)

    …Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the court in this asbestos-related personal injury action is a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 filed by General Dynamics Corporation ("General Dynamics"). (D…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 16, 2022 · in the opinion

    Thorne v. Crane Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2022)

    …(Id. at 23:20-24:25, 26:3-9) Repair of a leaking valve involved removal of the insulation from the pipelines and from any joints or unions. (Id. at 22:1-6) Thorne used a…