No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2018)

    …as successor-in-interest to Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company & Union Carbide Corporation, Defendants, represented by Clare Smith Rush, MARON MARVEL BRADLEY ANDERSON & TARDY, LLC & Marcy B. Croft, MARON MARVEL BRADLEY ANDERSON & TARDY, LLC. Detroit Diesel Corporation…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair (2019)

    …of Mississippi law. The Lohrmann test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product," Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)

    …Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · June 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)

    …Miss. 2005). This test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product." Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So. 3d 66…