You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A two-page letter of December 24, 1932, from C. H. Shoemaker, vice president of Canadian Johns-Manville at Asbestos, Quebec, answering S. A. Williams's memo of December 20. Since September 1931 nothing had been added to the dust equipment in the factory, "chiefly because the equipment there meets all practical requirements," and the Quebec Board of Health's medical officers had given it "a clear ticket." In the mills, improvements were under way, and Shoemaker expected a further program to bring an "80% reduction of the dust in the Mills."
- Author
- C. H. Shoemaker
- Sent to
- S. A. Williams
- Published by
- Canadian Johns-Manville
- Date
- December 24, 1932
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 11143 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11143
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Letter, December 24, 1932 · 2 pages · 69 KB
What it shows
Workers in the cement plant and dust shed wore masks, but "The Mill operators, however, do not find respirators practicable": the mill dust, Shoemaker writes, was less irritating and more fibrous, and clogged the filters. The men in the fiber mills at Asbestos, Quebec, generally went without respirators.
In Johns-Manville's chronology
Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:
C.H. Shoemaker (CJM VP, Asbestos), 12/24/32, responds to Williams' memorandum of 12/20/32. States that since September, 1931, no new dust collection equipment has been installed in the factory, chiefly because the equipment there meets "all practical requirements." Inspection by the medical officers of the Quebec Board of Health "indicates 'a clear ticket'." Describes some very important dust collection improvements initiated in the mills. Shoemaker states that if the prospective dust control program is carried out, it will result in an 80% reduction in the dust in the mills. States that workmen in the Cement plant and Dust Shed wear the hubble mask, and electricians wear this mask when blowing motors. However, mill operators, "do not find respirators practicable. The dust in the mills is evidently less irritating and is more fibrous than in the first named locations, resulting in less need for a respirator and more trouble with the filter clogging when a respirator is used."
Related documents
Cited on this site
Cite this document
“C. H. Shoemaker to S. A. Williams on Dust Collecting at Asbestos, Quebec.” December 24, 1932. Canadian Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11143. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11143.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.