No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

J. W. Szcygielski to Dr. C. U. Culmer on Waukegan Employees Not Consulted After Their Examinations (1980)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

A two-page confidential memo of March 14, 1980, from J. W. Szcygielski at the Waukegan, Illinois, plant to Dr. C. U. Culmer of the plant's medical department, copied to four others. Each employee was supposed to have a consultation about the findings after a physical examination, but at the recent meetings about "the newspaper interpretation of the NIOSH study" a number said they never had; he lists nine. He passes on other workers' comments: a son-in-law said a change on a worker's X-rays 19 years earlier had never been reported, one man said a medical problem that began in 1957 had only now been disclosed to him, and another said J-M "did not see asbestos on his lung but the Monroe Clinic did."

Author
J. W. Szcygielski
Sent to
Dr. C. U. Culmer
Published by
Johns-Manville
Date
March 14, 1980
Number
Bates 5500 01525
Library no.
ACL Doc 11566 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11566
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Memo, March 14, 1980 · 2 pages · 56 KB

What it shows

Szcygielski asked the medical department to give follow-up consultations to everyone on the list, to clear up the other questions, and to tell him what came of the talks. The memo came out of the meetings Dr. Paul described to Dr. Kotin (Paul to Kotin, March 1980), and it records a complaint J-M had heard before: workers learning late, or from outside doctors, what their own examinations showed (Zelienople, 1977).

In Johns-Manville's chronology

Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:

Szcygielski writes to Dr. Culmer (Waukegan), 3/14/80, that a number of employees have indicated that they had not been consulted regarding their exam findings. Szcygielski lists the names of these employees and asks Dr. Culmer to meet with them. One employee indicated that a change occurred on his lungs 19 years ago, but he had not been told about it.

Editor's note: J-M's description says one employee reported a change on his own lungs 19 years earlier that he had not been told about. The memo says a son-in-law reported that a change on a worker's X-rays 19 years earlier had never been reported.

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“J. W. Szcygielski to Dr. C. U. Culmer on Waukegan Employees Not Consulted After Their Examinations.” March 14, 1980. Bates 5500 01525. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11566. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11566.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.