You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
Three pages of minutes, signed by Clarence L. Sager, of a meeting at Johns-Manville's office on July 15, 1931, with Dr. A. J. Lanza and Dr. McConnell of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and J-M's Voorhees, Pond, Hughes and Sager, on physical examinations at J-M plants. Lanza recommended examining all applicants and all old employees, and every employee every two or three years, using fluoroscopes rather than X-ray machines. He advised that anyone with tuberculosis be kept out of the plant and that a worker whose lungs showed fibrosis "be transferred to a location in the plant where the exposure is not so great."
- Author
- Clarence L. Sager
- Published by
- Johns-Manville
- Date
- July 15, 1931
- Number
- Bates US 2722
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 11761 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11761
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Minutes, July 15, 1931 (two copies) · 6 pages · 302 KB
What it shows
The minutes record that "Dr. Lanza is very strongly of the opinion that asbestosis should be made compensable under the New Jersey law. He feels that this is the only protection which the industry has, and that permitting the disease to remain outside the compensable class lends encouragement to unethical lawyers and physicians to work up claims." Dr. McConnell reported that a Metropolitan Life engineer had found many particles getting through the Pangborn pressure mask, "thus tending to demonstrate the ineffectiveness of masks," and the meeting noted a New York State Department of Labor report that masks did not protect workers from rock dust. Two weeks later E. M. Voorhees sent these minutes to Vice President S. A. Williams (memo of July 28, 1931).
In Johns-Manville's chronology
Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:
Lanza Recommendations re: Medical Program. Minutes of meeting held 7/15/31 between J-M, Lanza, and McConnell (Metropolitan) notes that Hobart & Wardwell (J-M attorneys) had previously recommended physicals, including x-rays of all employees. Lanza recommended pre-employment and periodic exams and the use of fluoroscopes rather than x-ray equipment. Once a possible tuberculosis or fibrosis was identified
then x-rays could be used. Lanza advocated that employees showing signs of fibrosis be transferred to a location where exposure was lower. He stated that he believed that asbestosis should be compensable under New Jersey workers compensation law. McConnell reported that Fehnel (Metropolitan) had studied the Pangborn respirator and concluded that a high count of particles found their way through the mask, tending to "demonstrate the ineffectiveness of masks"; Discussion also referred to a New York State Department of Labor report which concluded that masks were not effective for protection of workers from the perils of breathing rock dust.
Editor's note: J-M's description says the minutes note that Hobart & Wardwell, J-M's attorneys, had recommended physical examinations including X-rays of all employees. That is not in these minutes.
Related documents
Cited on this site
- Asbestos History
- Asbestos Timeline
- E. M. Voorhees to S. A. Williams on Dust Conditions at J-M Factories (1931)
- Home Office, The Asbestos Industry (Asbestosis) Scheme (1931)
- Letter to George S. Hobart on Joseph Stepka's Disability Award (1930)
- S. A. Williams to A. R. Fisher with Dr. Lanza's Answers on Waukegan Dust Questions (1933)
- The Johns-Manville Knowledge Chronology
Cite this document
Clarence L. Sager. “Minutes of a Johns-Manville Meeting with Dr. Anthony Lanza on Physical Examinations.” July 15, 1931. Bates US 2722. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11761. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11761.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.