No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Vandiver Brown to the Saranac Sponsors Enclosing the Revised Report, Asbestos Pneumoconiosis (1949)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

An 81-page file: Vandiver Brown's letter of March 3, 1949, as J-M's secretary and general attorney, to the eight other companies that underwrote the Saranac Laboratory asbestos dust experiments (American Brakeblok, Gatke, Keasbey & Mattison, Raybestos-Manhattan, Russell Manufacturing, Thermoid (Southern Asbestos), Union Asbestos & Rubber and United States Gypsum), a four-page memorandum by Brown on the laboratory's September 30, 1948, draft, and the revised report of January 31, 1949. Brown wrote that the revised report "adopts the substance of all of the suggestions that were made by representatives of the underwriting group" at a meeting in New York on November 11, 1948. As "the findings are generally favorable," the sponsors had asked Saranac to publish it promptly, preferably in the Journal of Industrial Hygiene with an introduction by Dr. A. J. Lanza.

Author
Vandiver Brown
Sent to
the Saranac Sponsors
Published by
Johns-Manville
Date
March 3, 1949
Library no.
ACL Doc 11960 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11960
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Letter, March 3, 1949, with Brown's memorandum and the January 31, 1949, report · 81 pages · 3.0 MB

What it shows

Brown's memorandum quotes the 1936 agreement that the results would be "the property of those who are advancing the required funds," who would decide whether and how they were made public (the Saranac agreement). It notes that the 1948 draft reported pulmonary tumors in 9 of 11 mice exposed for a year to long-fibre dust, and argues that it was "premature to make any reference to 'neoplasms'" and that tumors should be the subject of separate experiments. It also suggests omitting a finding on non-tuberculous infection, and says any later Saranac report on human asbestosis should be separate and not subject to the sponsors' approval before publication. The enclosed final report says nothing about tumors in mice (Asbestos Pneumoconiosis). The earlier exchanges over the cancer reference are in the 1947 Brown and Bowditch letters and the November 1948 Vorwald letter.

In Johns-Manville's chronology

Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:

Letter dated 3/3/49 from Vandiver Brown to the nine companies who along with J-M funded the Saranac research. Brown reports having reviewed the final revised Saranac draft which "adopts the substance of all of the suggestions that were made by representatives of the underwriting group [the asbestos manufacturers]".

Editor's note: J-M's description says Brown wrote to the nine companies that funded the research along with J-M. The letter is addressed to eight companies; with J-M they made nine sponsors.

Cited by Barry Castleman

In Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects (5th edition, 2005), which cites it in:

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“Vandiver Brown to the Saranac Sponsors Enclosing the Revised Report, Asbestos Pneumoconiosis.” March 3, 1949. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11960. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11960.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.