You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A one-page copy of a letter of May 6, 1938, from Dr. Kenneth Lynch, a Charleston, South Carolina, pathologist, to Julian Mitchell, Raybestos-Manhattan's attorney in Charleston, commenting on Dr. Leroy Gardner's report on fine asbestos dust compared with longer fiber dust. Lynch wrote that "the only thing that can yet be positively stated is that in the human sufficient exposure to asbestos dust will cause asbestosis," while what counts as sufficient exposure was still unknown. He did not follow Vandiver Brown's suggestion, in a letter of April 28, 1938, that Gardner's experiments would answer the claim that the scarring is progressive.
- Author
- Kenneth M. Lynch
- Sent to
- Julian Mitchell
- Series
- The Motley 1000
- Date
- May 6, 1938
- Numbers
- Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001307 – 001307; Motley 1000 no. 218
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 12982 · asbestosclaims.law/library/12982
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Letter, May 6, 1938 · 1 pages · 79 KB
What it shows
Gardner's findings suggested the coarser dust might be more harmful than the fine, and Lynch thought the factory should begin to think more about precautions in departments where the dust was coarser. He also doubted that Gardner's work said anything about whether asbestosis exists at all, as E. H. Jeffords had suggested to him, and he wrote that no one could know the hazard at the local plant until its workers were examined in the way the South African report described.
In Johns-Manville's index
Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:
Dr. Kenneth Lynch (Charleston, S.C.) letter to Julian Mitchell, 5/6/38, commenting on Dr. Gardner's report of his recent investigations on the effects of exposure to fine asbestos dust as compared to longer fiber dust. Dr. Lynch states that "the only thing that can yet be positively stated is that in the human sufficient exposure to asbestos dust will cause asbestosis," but it is still not known what causes sufficient exposure. Dr. Lynch does not agree with V. Brown that Dr. Gardner's experiments negate claims that fibrosis is of a progressive character.
About this copy
This is document 218 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001307 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001307.
Cited by Barry Castleman
In Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects (5th edition, 2005), which cites it in:
- Chapter 9 (Company Knowledge), p. 495
Cited on this site
- Asbestos Timeline
- E. H. Jeffords to Julian Mitchell Forwarding Simpson's and Brown's Letters and the Shabani Extract (1938)
- E. H. Jeffords to Sumner Simpson on Gardner's Report and the Shabani Mines Extract (1938)
- Leroy Gardner to Sumner Simpson on Dr. Lynch's Comments and His Asbestosis Cases (1938)
- Leroy U. Gardner, Second Progress Report on Experimental Asbestosis (1938)
- Reading Castleman, Chapter 9
- Sumner Simpson to Leroy U. Gardner Enclosing Dr. Lynch's Letter (1938)
- Sumner Simpson to Vandiver Brown Enclosing Dr. Lynch's Letter (1938)
- The Motley 1000
- The Sumner Simpson Papers
- Vandiver Brown to Sumner Simpson on Dr. Lynch's Comments on Gardner's Second Progress Report (1938)
- Vandiver Brown to Sumner Simpson on Gardner's Findings and Claims of Progressive Fibrosis (1938)
Cite this document
Kenneth M. Lynch. “Dr. Kenneth Lynch to Julian Mitchell on Gardner's Fine-Dust Findings.” May 6, 1938. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001307 – 001307, Motley 1000 no. 218. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 12982. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/12982.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.