C. R. Rotthoff to W. J. Vincent on South Charleston Provisions for Asbestos Material Removal and Disposal (1987)

Internal correspondence in which C. R. Rotthoff commented on W. J. Vincent's South Charleston asbestos removal document, saying it assumed no technology exists to keep asbestos below the PEL. He suggested identifying which steps are mandatory because the PEL will or may be exceeded. The enclosed draft, 'Provisions for Asbestos Material Removal and Disposal,' sets out the purpose, Superfund release reporting, and definitions including exposure limits.

What the document holds

• Page 1: Memo from C. R. Rotthoff to W. J. Vincent commenting on the asbestos removal document and the PEL
• Page 2: Enclosure: 'Provisions for Asbestos Material Removal and Disposal' (purpose and definitions)

People and organizations

From C. R. Rotthoff (HS&EA, Personnel Safety & Occupational Health) to W. J. Vincent; S. W. Drake (cc, letter copy only); D. A. Gosselin (cc); M. J. Shoger (cc, letter copy only).

• Chuck Rotthoff (author)
• W. J. Vincent (recipient)
• S. W. Drake (copied)
• D. A. Gosselin (copied)
• M. J. Shoger (copied)
• Specialty Chemicals Division (its organization)
• Union Carbide Corporation (its organization)
• National Response Center (named)
• OSHA (named)
• Plant Environmental Protection Department (named)
• West Virginia Air Pollution Control Commission (named)
• West Virginia Department of Natural Resources (named)

Related pages

Pages on our site about what this document covers: OSHA · Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) · West Virginia Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage.

About this copy

This is document UC-3166 of the Union Carbide documents, documents produced and used as evidence in asbestos lawsuits against Union Carbide, 2 pages. Production numbers UCC 000262 to UCC 000263.