No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Bartus v. Johns-Manville, Pleadings and Worker's Statement Withdrawing the Suit (1929)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

Court papers from Frank Bartus v. Johns-Manville Corporation, filed July 23, 1929, in the New Jersey Supreme Court for Somerset County and removed to the U.S. District Court for New Jersey (42 pages). The complaint, by attorney Samuel Greenstone, said Bartus worked at J-M's Manville plant in November 1927 "and for several years prior thereto," was never warned of the asbestos dust, and became "a victim of tuberculosis." The papers include J-M's removal petition and bond (New York Indemnity Company, surety), its answer, and affidavits by plant manager Archibald Hughes and Emil Ramer with a seven-page handwritten statement Bartus signed in Hughes's office on November 8, 1929. On April 14, 1930, the suit was discontinued without costs after Greenstone told the court that, although properly authorized, he did not wish to continue it "against the present wishes of his client."

Series
The Motley 1000
Date
July 23, 1929
Numbers
Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-003375 – 003416; Motley 1000 no. 740
Library no.
ACL Doc 23897 · asbestosclaims.law/library/23897
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Court papers, 1929-1930 · 42 pages · 2.3 MB

What it shows

In the statement, taken down by Ramer while Bartus was still working at the plant, Bartus said he did not want to sue and regretted signing the lawyer's papers "believing that I would get some easy money." He also said he had told Greenstone that his tuberculosis "is inherited" and that his father died of it, and that Greenstone thought he had a good case "on account of poor ventilation." The statement ends that he made it "without being promised any money, any better job, or anything else." Unlike the Zackwiejz suits (Motley #738, #739), this one ended without a settlement.

In Johns-Manville's index

Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:

Various pleadings filed in Frank Bartus v. J-M Corp. Complaint was filed on 7/23/29 in the Supreme Court of Somerset County, New Jersey. Case was removed to U.S.D.C., New Jersey. Bartus was a textile worker at J-M's Manville plant for approximately 1 year. New York Indemnity was the surety on the removal bond.

About this copy

This is document 740 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-003375 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-003416.

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“Bartus v. Johns-Manville, Pleadings and Worker's Statement Withdrawing the Suit.” July 23, 1929. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-003375 – 003416, Motley 1000 no. 740. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 23897. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/23897.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.