No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Dr. Kenneth W. Smith to N. W. Hendry, "Asbestos versus Cancer" (1965)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

A one-page memo of June 16, 1965, from Dr. Kenneth W. Smith, J-M's medical director, to N. W. Hendry of the Asbestos Fibre Division, answering a May 20 inquiry headed "Asbestos versus Cancer." Smith wrote that "a considerable amount of unnecessary publicity" had followed a study of two groups of insulation workers, and that he did not believe "the so-called facts which were reported are basically correct": the men were called "asbestos workers" only because they belonged to the Asbestos Workers Union, and the report "simply blamed everything on the asbestos fiber." He added, "I personally do not believe that there is a serious health hazard associated with the use of asbestos."

Author
Kenneth W. Smith
Published by
Johns-Manville
Date
June 16, 1965
Library no.
ACL Doc 11309 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11309
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Memo, June 16, 1965 · 1 pages · 53 KB

What it shows

Smith rested his view on more than 20 years of watching over 2,000 employees at J-M's mine and mill in Quebec, where, he wrote, "we have no lung cancer or other serious health problems," and on his belief that with reasonable precautions "no health problem will exist." The study he described is evidently Dr. Irving Selikoff's work on New York and New Jersey insulators. The same argument about "so-called 'asbestos workers'" reappears in J-M's 1966 position paper.

In Johns-Manville's chronology

Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:

Dr. K.W. Smith memorandum to N.W. Hendry (AFD, Asbestos), 6/16/65. Dr. Smith states that he disagrees with the results of the recent study of two groups of insulation workers (presumably the Selikoff report) which has caused "a considerable amount of unnecessary publicity" concerning asbestos in the news.

Dr. Smith's main problem with the report is that the men examined, who were called "asbestos workers," were men who belonged to the asbestos workers union, a group of men who are exposed to asbestos fiber along with other potentially toxic materials. The report "simply blamed everything on the asbestos fiber."

Dr. Smith does not believe that there is a serious health hazard associated with the use of asbestos. He bases his opinion on the fact that he has worked in the asbestos industry for over 20 years and has seen no indication that an extensive health hazard exists. He has observed over 2,000 employees at the Asbestos mine and mill for over 20 years and he has seen no lung cancer or other serious health problems. "It is my belief that when reasonable precautions are taken in the handling of the fiber and satisfactory working conditions are maintained, no health problem will exist."

Cited on this site

Cite this document

Kenneth W. Smith. “Dr. Kenneth W. Smith to N. W. Hendry, "Asbestos versus Cancer".” June 16, 1965. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11309. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11309.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.