You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A one-page Raybestos-Manhattan memo of October 2, 1973, headed "NIOSH," from John H. Marsh to W. S. Simpson, forwarding a memo (not included) from Fred Puckhaber about the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's proposed study of the Johns-Manville textile plant in Manville, New Jersey. Marsh wrote that "we" had hoped NIOSH would choose another company's plant, "since the J-M textile plant is reportedly well under two fibers and certainly is not representative of the asbestos textile industry." George Wright had told him of his concern that a study of the Manville plant "might result in a proposed standard unacceptable to the rest of the industry."
- Author
- John H. Marsh
- Sent to
- W. S. Simpson
- Published by
- Raybestos-Manhattan
- Series
- The Motley 1000
- Date
- October 2, 1973
- Numbers
- Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002230 – 002230; Motley 1000 no. 646
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 13070 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13070
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Memo, October 2, 1973 · 1 pages · 26 KB
What it shows
The memo shows Raybestos-Manhattan preferring that federal researchers study a dustier plant, out of concern that results from a cleaner Johns-Manville plant would support a stricter exposure standard than the rest of the textile industry wanted. Marsh added that the Manville plant's textiles were used inside Johns-Manville and that its process was not suited to making most asbestos textile products.
In Johns-Manville's index
Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:
J.H. Marsh memo to W.S. Simpson, 10/2/73, entitled "NIOSH." Marsh states that "we" had hoped NIOSH would select "Amatek" over the J-M Manville textile plant for the proposed NIOSH study, "since the J-M plant is reportedly well under two fibers and certainly is not representative of the asbestos textile industry." Marsh further states that several weeks ago Dr. George Wright expressed his concern that the study of the Manville plant "might result in a proposed standard unacceptable to the rest of the industry."
About this copy
This is document 646 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002230 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002230.
Cited on this site
Cite this document
“John H. Marsh to W. S. Simpson on the NIOSH Study of J-M's Manville Textile Plant.” October 2, 1973. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002230 – 002230, Motley 1000 no. 646. Raybestos-Manhattan. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13070. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13070.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.