You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
Nine papers from January 1957 to May 1958 on dust in "A" Building, the textile building at J-M's Manville, New Jersey, plant. They begin with a letter from Edward Macko, president of Federal Labor Union No. 21626, to M. F. Naylor, J-M's manager of industrial relations, listing five complaints and saying that conditions were "getting worse than they were back 4 or 5 years ago": surveys always came back "Not To Bad," but the workers "know that they are eating more dust today than before. Also doctors are telling them that they should get out of this dust." Plant managers met on January 21 and set out a list of dust control projects, and that August the union was invited to pick the spots for new dust counts in the card room.
- Author
- Edward Macko; C. L. Sheckler; H. M. Jackson; U. D. Torrance; H. J. O'Brien; V. J. Liotta
- Published by
- Johns-Manville
- Date
- January 15, 1957
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
- Edward Macko to M. F. Naylor, January 15, 1957 ACL Doc 11890 · 1 pp. · PDF, 40 KB
- Minutes of meeting on dust in "A" Building, January 21, 1957 ACL Doc 11891 · 2 pp. · PDF, 76 KB
- H. J. O'Brien to K. W. Huffine, January 23, 1957 ACL Doc 11892 · 1 pp. · PDF, 23 KB
- U. D. Torrance to C. L. Sheckler, August 6, 1957 ACL Doc 11893 · 1 pp. · PDF, 28 KB
- Edward Macko to C. L. Sheckler, October 8, 1957 ACL Doc 11894 · 1 pp. · PDF, 32 KB
- C. L. Sheckler to M. F. Naylor, October 9, 1957 ACL Doc 11895 · 1 pp. · PDF, 34 KB
- H. M. Jackson to C. L. Sheckler, October 18, 1957 ACL Doc 11896 · 1 pp. · PDF, 37 KB
- C. L. Sheckler to U. D. Torrance, December 4, 1957 ACL Doc 11897 · 1 pp. · PDF, 41 KB
- U. D. Torrance to C. L. Sheckler, May 8, 1958 ACL Doc 11898 · 1 pp. · PDF, 38 KB
What it shows
Before the card room survey began, C. L. Sheckler, J-M's safety engineer at Manville, warned Naylor in a confidential memo that the "interested parties" would surely ask for the results, and that if the counts were over the limit, "we have probably forfeited any future legal defense against claims of non-occupational illnesses which purport to be aggravated by dust." H. M. Jackson, manager of J-M's Industrial Health Program, then recommended taking at least three samples at each station, first teaching the union committee "the basic concepts of a pneumoconiosis producing situation," and giving the union no copy of the results: "I do not believe that such would be of any constructive value to them." The survey, analyzed by Travelers, found two of 44 samples over New Jersey's limit and five over J-M's own standard, and Sheckler called the results "favorable." A May 1958 memo says conditions in the spinning department were still unsatisfactory. For the building's earlier history, see the Stevens memo on reducing exposure in "A" Building.
In Johns-Manville's chronology
Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:
Edward Macko (President of a local Manville labor union) writes to M.F. Naylor (Manager of Industrial Relations, Manville) on 1/15/57, complaining about the dusty conditions in which employees in "A" Building (Textiles) must work. He states that although J-M tells the employees that the conditions are not too bad, "they know that they are eating more dust today than before. Also doctors are telling them that they should get out of this dust." Macko requests some action on this matter. Personnel from the Manville plant meet on 1/21/57 to discuss the various complaints cited in the letter of 1/15/57 and remedies.
One of the areas that the union is complaining about is the Card Room. In order to evaluate the performance of the Card Room Dust House, U.D. Torrance (Manville) writes on 8/6/57, asking Macko to determine locations for dust sampling, and on 10/8/57 Macko responds. C.L. Sheckler, on 10/9/57, tells M.F. Naylor that no doubt there will be a request for the results of these studies by the interested parties and if the results are in excess, "we have probably forfeited any future legal defense against claims of non-occupational illnesses which purport to be aggravated by dust."
H.M. Jackson writes to Sheckler, 10/18/57, recommending that certain steps be taken to insure the validity of the survey and that J-M indoctrinate the union committee in the interpretation of survey results. Jackson recommends that the survey results not be given to the union representatives for various reasons. C.L. Sheckler reports back to U.D. Torrance, 12/4/57, with the results of the industrial hygiene survey of the Card Room. (Two or three samples were taken at each location so as to determine average working conditions.) Forty-four samples were taken; only two were over NJ's standards and five were above J-M's standards.
Editor's note: J-M's description says U. D. Torrance wrote to Macko on August 6, 1957, asking him to choose sampling locations. The August 6 memo was addressed to C. L. Sheckler, with a copy to Macko; it asked Sheckler to arrange the dust counts and said the union would choose the locations.
Related documents
Cited on this site
Cite this document
Edward Macko, C. L. Sheckler, H. M. Jackson, U. D. Torrance, H. J. O'Brien, V. J. Liotta. “Union Complaints and J-M Correspondence on Dust in the Manville Textile "A" Building.” January 15, 1957. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/documents/union-complaints-and-j-m-correspondence-on-dust-in-the-manville-textile-a-building-1957.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.