Ablation mechanism of polymer layered silicate nanocomposite heat shield

Our plain-English summary of Ablation mechanism of polymer layered silicate nanocomposite heat shield, by A.R. Bahramian, M. Kokabi (Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009).

The study

• Authors: A.R. Bahramian, M. Kokabi
• Journal: Journal of Hazardous Materials
• Published: 2009;166(1):445-54
• Cited by: 5 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher

Abstract

Recent advances in polymer layered silicate nanocomposites especially improve flammability resistance; encourage the examination of this unique class of evolving materials as potential ablatives. Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites show excellent potential as ablative heat shields. Determining the thermal diffusivity together with the mass and energy transfer is an important problem encountered in design of heat shield system which pyrolyses and ablates at high temperature. The aim of this work is to give information on the influence of the experimental conditions to the estimated effective thermal diffusivity of ablative nanocomposite and composite materials. Here, we present the inverse solution to estimate the parameter used to identify the effective thermal diffusivity of resol type phenolic resin-asbestos cloth montmorillonite layered silicate nanocomposite and its composite counterpart. The experimental setup consists of a standard oxyacetylene flame test. The transient temperature measurements, taken from the top surface and through the thickness of the samples, are used in the inverse analysis to estimate the change of the effective thermal diffusivity. The results of this work clarify the mechanism of the ablation and thermal diffusivity of the layered silicate nanocomposite heat shields due to the high temperature degradation in comparison with its composite counterpart.

In plain English

This was a laboratory materials-engineering study of heat-shield materials, not of people or health. The authors made panels of phenolic resin reinforced with asbestos cloth, with and without added montmorillonite clay (up to 6% by weight, in a sample called NMA3). They tested the panels with an oxyacetylene flame, thermal analysis, cone calorimetry and electron microscopy, and modelled heat flow through the material. Adding clay improved thermal stability. After 20 seconds of flame, measured char and pyrolysis surface erosion was 1.9 and 2.6 mm for the asbestos cloth/phenolic composite and 1.3 and 2.1 mm for NMA3. In the cone calorimeter, NMA3 showed 51% lower heat release rate and 40% lower mass loss than the composite. X-ray analysis indicated that the composite's mineral changed from clinochrysotile to forsterite after the flame test. The authors concluded that, with 3400 K hot gas and an external heat flux of 9 million watts per square metre, NMA3's ablation performance was 100% more than the composite's. They noted that their erosion calculation ignored the force of the flame stream, and that the flame test alone could not properly show the difference.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Laboratory materials experiment (flame testing, thermal analysis and computer modelling of heat-shield samples); no human or animal subjects
• Who was studied: Laboratory-made samples: an asbestos cloth/phenolic resin composite and asbestos cloth/phenolic resin/montmorillonite nanocomposites (NMA1, NMA2, NMA3), with the main comparison between the composite and NMA3 (6% by weight organoclay)
• Exposure: Materials were exposed to an oxyacetylene flame (3400 K hot gas). Asbestos cloth (Grade AAA) was the reinforcement. X-ray analysis identified its mineral as clinochrysotile. No human exposure was studied.
• Main results:
  • Adding clay improved the thermal stability of the nanocomposites compared with the asbestos/phenolic composite
  • After 20 seconds of flame testing, measured char and pyrolysis surface erosion was 1.9 and 2.6 mm for the composite and 1.3 and 2.1 mm for the NMA3 nanocomposite
  • In the section of the sample where the char layer formed, the estimated effective thermal diffusivity of the composite was twice that of NMA3
  • In cone calorimetry, NMA3 showed 51% lower heat release rate and 40% lower mass loss than the asbestos cloth/phenolic composite
  • X-ray diffraction indicated that the composite's mineral composition changed from clinochrysotile to forsterite after the flame test
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that, under their test conditions (an external heat flux of 9 million watts per square metre and a hot-gas temperature of 3400 K), the ablation performance of the NMA3 nanocomposite heat shield was 100% more than that of the composite counterpart
• Limitations the authors state:
  • Differences between measured and calculated erosion were attributed to leaving out the force of the flame's gas stream in the calculation
  • The oxyacetylene flame test alone could not properly account for the nanocomposite's higher ablative performance, so other techniques were used
  • Transmission electron microscopy could not image the clay layers because of the asbestos fabric

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Silicate, Phenolic Resin.

Related studies

• High temperature ablation of kaolinite layered silicate/phenolic resin/asbestos cloth nanocomposite — A.R. Bahramian, M. Kokabi, et al. (2008)
• Balanced TH1 and TH2 immunopotentiating effects of silicates partly containing nanoparticles present in calcined serpentine — A. Elahi, Y. Sharma, et al. (2016)
• Students' Perceived Heat-Health Symptoms Increased with Warmer Classroom Temperatures — S. Bidassey-Manilal, C.Y. Wright, et al. (2016)
• Exploration of the role of heat activation in enhancing serpentine carbon sequestration reactions — M.J. McKelvy, A.V. Chizmeshya, et al. (2004)
• Socio-economic, infrastructural and health-related risk factors associated with adverse heat-health effects reportedly experienced during hot weather in South Africa — C.Y. Wright, F. Dominick, et al. (2019)
• Free radical activity of natural and heat treated amphibole asbestos — C. Otero Areán, F. Barceló, et al. (2001)

Browse more research in Journal of Hazardous Materials, or return to medical research.