High temperature ablation of kaolinite layered silicate/phenolic resin/asbestos cloth nanocomposite

Our plain-English summary of High temperature ablation of kaolinite layered silicate/phenolic resin/asbestos cloth nanocomposite, by A.R. Bahramian, M. Kokabi, M.H. Famili, et al (Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008).

The study

• Authors: A.R. Bahramian, M. Kokabi, M.H. Famili, M.H. Beheshty
• Journal: Journal of Hazardous Materials
• Published: 2008;150(1):136-45
• Cited by: 4 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher

Abstract

The successful return of re-entry space vehicle, which is subjected to severe aerodynamic heating, is largely accompanied by some provisions to reduce the heat transfer to the structure. Heat shield is the best protection means which undergoes physical, chemical, and mostly endothermal transformations. The objective of this work is to investigate the ablating, charring, and thermal degradation behaviour of heat shield resol-type phenolic resin/kaolinite/asbestos cloth nanocomposite by oxyacetylene flame test with an external heat flux of 8 x 10(9)W/m(2) and 3000 K hot gas temperature and thermal analyzer techniques. Kinetic parameters of thermal degradation and temperature distribution at the back surface of the nanocomposite heat shield were determined and compared with that of composite counterpart.

In plain English

This was a laboratory materials study, not a health study. It did not examine any people, exposures to people, or disease. The authors made flat heat-shield panels, intended for re-entry space vehicles, from asbestos cloth soaked in phenolic resin. The asbestos cloth made up about half the weight of each sample. They compared a plain asbestos cloth/phenolic composite with three versions that also contained chemically treated kaolinite clay, called NKA1, NKA2 and NKA3. After a 15-second oxyacetylene flame test, the back surface of panels made of a 4 mm layer of each material on 2 mm of aluminum reached 78.4 degrees C for NKA3, 80.89 for NKA2, 86.315 for NKA1 and 138.53 for the plain composite. In cone calorimetry, NKA3 had a 35% lower heat release rate and 22% lower mass loss than the plain composite. X-ray analysis showed that, after flame testing, the mineral in the plain composite changed from clinochrysotile to forsterite. The authors concluded that the clay formed an aluminum silicate ceramic char layer, and that NKA3's ablation performance was 43.4% higher than the plain composite's.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Laboratory materials experiment comparing heat-shield panels (thermogravimetric analysis, oxyacetylene flame test, cone calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy); no human or animal subjects
• Who was studied: Test panels, not people: one asbestos cloth/phenolic resin composite and three asbestos cloth/phenolic resin/kaolinite nanocomposites (NKA1, NKA2, NKA3), each a flat panel 6 x 100 x 100 mm made of 4 mm of composite on 2 mm of aluminum
• Exposure: Not a human exposure study. Asbestos cloth (Grade AAA) was used as reinforcement, at about 50% of sample weight, in phenolic resin with 0 to 6% kaolinite clay by weight. X-ray diffraction identified the asbestos mineral as clinochrysotile.
• Main results:
  • At the end of the 15 s oxyacetylene flame test, back-surface temperatures for the 4 mm material layers (on 2 mm of aluminum) were 78.4 degrees C (NKA3), 80.89 (NKA2), 86.315 (NKA1) and 138.53 (plain asbestos/phenolic composite)
  • In cone calorimetry at 80 kW/m2, the NKA3 nanocomposite had a 35% lower heat release rate and 22% lower mass loss than the asbestos cloth/phenolic composite
  • In thermogravimetric analysis, thermal decomposition of the kaolinite-containing nanocomposites shifted slightly toward higher temperatures compared with the plain composite
  • After flame testing, the mineral composition of the plain composite changed from clinochrysotile to forsterite. NKA3 after testing showed forsterite and aluminum silicate.
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that the char layer of the nanocomposite is an aluminum silicate-based ceramic, and that under their flame-test conditions NKA3's ablation performance was 43.4% higher than that of the asbestos cloth/phenolic composite
• Limitations the authors state:
  • The authors state that transmission electron microscopy could not give useful information because of the asbestos cloth (about 50% by weight), so they used other methods to confirm the nanocomposite structure

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestos textiles.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Silicate, Phenolic Resin.

Related studies

• Ablation mechanism of polymer layered silicate nanocomposite heat shield — A.R. Bahramian, M. Kokabi (2009)
• Attenuation of oxidative stress and chromosomal aberrations in cultured macrophages and pulmonary cells following self-sustained high temperature synthesis of asbestos — S. La Maestra, R.T. Micale, et al. (2020)
• Crystal chemistry of the high temperature product of transformation of cement-asbestos — A. Viani, A.F. Gualtieri, et al. (2013)
• Students' Perceived Heat-Health Symptoms Increased with Warmer Classroom Temperatures — S. Bidassey-Manilal, C.Y. Wright, et al. (2016)
• Balanced TH1 and TH2 immunopotentiating effects of silicates partly containing nanoparticles present in calcined serpentine — A. Elahi, Y. Sharma, et al. (2016)
• High-temperature calcined fullerene nanowhiskers as well as long needle-like multi-wall carbon nanotubes have abilities to induce NLRP3-mediated IL-1β secretion — H. Cui, W. Wu, et al. (2014)

Browse more research in Journal of Hazardous Materials, or return to medical research.