No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Asbestos-related pleuropulmonary diseases: evaluation with low-dose four-detector row spiral CT

Our plain-English summary of Asbestos-related pleuropulmonary diseases: evaluation with low-dose four-detector row spiral CT, by M. Remy-Jardin, A. Sobaszek, A. Duhamel, et al (Radiology, 2004).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: M. Remy-Jardin, A. Sobaszek, A. Duhamel, I. Mastora, C. Zanetti, J. Remy
  • Journal: Radiology
  • Published: 2004;233(1):182-90
  • Cited by: 45 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
  • Read it: PubMed · Publisher

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the depiction of lung and pleural asbestos-related lesions with low-dose four-detector row spiral computed tomography (CT).

Materials And Methods: Eighty-three male workers with a mean duration of occupational exposure to asbestos of 18 years underwent CT as part of a medicolegal investigation. CT examination included low-dose multi-detector row spiral CT of the entire thorax, with reconstruction of contiguous 5-mm-thick images, and thin-section CT, which served as the reference standard for the detection of pleural and parenchymal asbestos-related abnormalities. Two main groups of abnormalities were identified: (a) pleural plaques and diffuse pleural thickening and (b) thickened interstitial short lines, curvilinear subpleural lines, ground-glass opacity with or without bronchiectasis, and honeycombing. The frequencies of the depiction of these abnormalities on the low-dose multi-detector row images and the thin-section images were compared by using the McNemar test.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the low-dose and thin-section CT images in the depiction of either (a) parietal pleural fibrosis consisting of pleural plaques (identified in 67 [81%] vs 65 [78%] workers, P =.157), which appeared mainly as thick, calcified pleural linear structures; or (b) features of parenchymal fibrosis, which consisted of various combinations of intralobular and septal lines (identified in 12 [14%] vs 13 [16%] workers, P =.564), subpleural curvilinear lines (identified in 10 [12%] vs eight [10%] workers, P =.157), and ground-glass opacity with (identified in six [7%] vs six [7%] workers) or without (identified in five [6%] vs three [4%] workers, P =.317) traction bronchiectasis. A honeycombing pattern was depicted on only the thin-section CT images (P <.001). Emphysema (identified in 26 [31%] vs 14 [17%] workers at low-dose and thin-section CT, respectively; P <.001) and noncalcified nodules (identified in 18 [22%] workers vs one [1%] worker, P <.001) were depicted significantly more frequently on the low-dose images than on the thin-section images.

Conclusion: Low-dose multi-detector row spiral CT accurately depicts asbestos-related disease.

Copyright RSNA, 2004

In plain English

This French study compared two kinds of chest CT scan in 83 men who had worked with asbestos for a mean of 18 years; their exposure histories included making insulation products and automotive friction materials. The men were referred to a hospital in Lille between April 2001 and March 2002 for medicolegal follow-up, and 67 (81%) had no symptoms. Each man had a low-dose scan of the whole chest and, in the same session, a thin-section scan, which served as the reference standard. Parietal pleural plaques were seen in 67 (81%) men on low-dose images and in 65 (78%) on thin-section images, which was not a significant difference. Signs of asbestosis also did not differ significantly. However, in two men, findings seen on thin-section images were read as ground-glass opacity on the low-dose images. Fissural plaques, emphysema and small noncalcified nodules were seen significantly more often on low-dose images. The authors concluded that low-dose CT accurately detected asbestos-related disease. They noted the small sample, and that only 22 of the 83 men had CT features of asbestosis.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Diagnostic imaging comparison study: two CT techniques (low-dose four-detector row spiral CT and thin-section CT, the reference standard) performed in the same subjects in one session, with findings compared by the McNemar test
  • Who was studied: 83 consecutive men referred to the Department of Radiology of Hospital Calmette, Lille, France, between April 2001 and March 2002 for evaluation of asbestos-related disease as part of medicolegal follow-up. 57 were retired and 26 were still working. Mean age was 67.1 years (range 49 to 81). 26 were smokers, 30 were former smokers and 27 were nonsmokers. 67 (81%) had no symptoms and 16 (19%) reported dyspnea.
  • Exposure: Occupational asbestos exposure; fiber types were not specified. The men's exposure histories included manufacturing insulation products (mainly for gas-liquefying machines or shipbuilding) and producing friction materials for automotive products. Mean exposure duration was 18 years (range 3 to 40 years). Mean time since first exposure was 46.29 years (range 31 to 59 years).
  • Main results:
    • Parietal pleural plaques were identified in 67 (81%) of the 83 men on low-dose CT and in 65 (78%) on thin-section CT. The difference was not significant (P = .157 in Table 1).
    • Fissural pleural plaques were seen significantly more often on low-dose CT (10 [12%] men) than on thin-section CT (3 [4%] men), P = .008. The authors attributed this to gaps between the spaced-out thin-section images, which missed some lesions.
    • There was no significant difference between the two techniques in detecting CT features of asbestosis. Septal and intralobular lines were seen in 12 (14%) men on low-dose vs 13 (16%) on thin-section CT. Subpleural curvilinear lines were seen in 10 (12%) vs 8 (10%).
    • Honeycombing was seen on thin-section CT in one man but not on his low-dose images, where it was recorded as ground-glass opacity. In a second man, intralobular lines seen on thin-section images were also recorded as ground-glass opacity on low-dose images.
    • Emphysema was seen in 26 (31%) men on low-dose CT vs 14 (17%) on thin-section CT. Noncalcified micronodules were seen in 18 (22%) vs 1 (1%). Both were significantly more frequent on low-dose CT. The 32 nodules found on low-dose images were classified as indeterminate.
    • Respiratory motion artifacts appeared in 7 (8%) low-dose examinations and were always minimal. No artifacts altered interpretation, and all low-dose images were judged acceptable.
    • The low-dose protocol had a mean weighted CT dose index of 4.7 mGy and a mean dose length product of 142.7 mGy times cm. Effective dose was not calculated for individual subjects. Based on manufacturer data, the estimated effective dose was 1.9 mSv for a male patient, compared with 3.4 mSv for the standard protocol on the same scanner.
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that low-dose multi-detector row spiral CT enabled accurate detection of asbestos-related disease and a concurrent search for malignant asbestos-related processes of the lungs and pleura. They also stated that, with their protocol, negative low-dose CT results were sufficient to exclude asbestos-related pleuropulmonary diseases.
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The sample was small (83 subjects). A larger population with wider variation in body weight might have given different results.
    • Only a small proportion of subjects had CT features of asbestosis: 22 (26%) of 83.
    • Lung fibrosis was mostly limited to the lower lung zones. The study therefore evaluated low-dose CT more for subtle abnormalities than for advanced disease.
    • The 5-mm thickness of the low-dose images caused volume-averaging effects, which led to the two mischaracterized cases.
    • The comparison set low-dose scans covering the entire chest against thin-section images covering only the lungs, with a mean of eight sections per subject.

Topics

The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestosis, Pleural plaques and thickening.

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Occupational Exposure, Thorax, Pleural Plaques, Diffuse Pleural Thickening, Interstitial, Subpleural Curvilinear Line, Ground-Glass Opacity, Honeycombing.

Browse more research in Radiology, or return to medical research.

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

M. Remy-Jardin, A. Sobaszek, A. Duhamel, I. Mastora, C. Zanetti, J. Remy. Asbestos-related pleuropulmonary diseases: evaluation with low-dose four-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 2004;233(1):182-90. doi:10.1148/radiol.2331031133. PMID: 15333769.

Cite our summary

“Asbestos-related pleuropulmonary diseases: evaluation with low-dose four-detector row spiral CT.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/asbestos-related-pleuropulmonary-diseases-evaluation-with-low-dose.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.