The Oncologist

Our medical research library holds 15 studies published in The Oncologist (2001–2022). Each entry links to the study's record on PubMed and, where there is one, to the publisher's page and a free full text. 15 have an abstract, the authors' own summary as PubMed records it: open "Abstract" to read it.

About the journal

• Publisher: Oxford University Press
• Published: 1996 to the present, England
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1083-7159 (print), 1549-490X (electronic)
• Its record in the NLM Catalog

2020s

• Evolving Landscape of Initial Treatments for Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesotheliomas: Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice. M. Offin, V.W. Rusch, A. Rimner, et al. 2022;27(8):610-614. PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is the most common form of mesothelioma and the type most often studied in prospective clinical trials.This review reports the trials that have shaped first-line treatment for patients with advanced/unresectable MPM and the real-world integration of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors into clinical practice.

• Prevention of Pemetrexed-Induced Rash Using Low-Dose Corticosteroids: A Phase II Study. T. Sakurada, H. Nokihara, T. Koga, et al. 2022;27(7):e554-e560. PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Background: Rash eruptions are a common side-effect of pemetrexed, for which the administration of 8 mg/day of dexamethasone for 3 days from the day preceding pemetrexed administration is recommended. This study aimed to prospectively assess the effectiveness of prophylactic administration of low-dose dexamethasone for pemetrexed-induced rashes.

  Methods: This single-arm, phase II study recruited patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma scheduled to receive chemotherapy including pemetrexed. Patients received 2 mg of dexamethasone daily from days 2 to 6 after chemotherapy with pemetrexed. The primary endpoint was the 3-week incidence of rash eruptions.

  Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled between September 2017 and May 2019. The incidence of rash after 3 weeks was 16.7%. Rashes erupted mainly on the upper half of the body, such as the chest and neck, and were of grades 1 and 2 in 2 patients each. No rashes of grade 3 or higher were observed, and there were no adverse events associated with additional corticosteroids.

  Conclusion: Prophylactic administration of low-dose dexamethasone for 5 days from the day after pemetrexed administration resulted in a milder incidence and severity of rash. These findings may provide a standard preventative strategy for pemetrexed-induced rashes. (Trial identifier: UMIN000025666).

  © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

• A Novel Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma with STRN Exon 2 and ALK Exon 20: A Case Report and Literature Review. C. Miyagawa, H. Takaya, K. Sakai, et al. 2021;26(5):356-361. Case report · Review PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Recently, several malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas (MPMs), occurring in young women without asbestos exposure and with fusion genes such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1, have been reported. In the present case, we encountered MPM with STRN-ALK fusion in a 17-year-old female adolescent. The case did not respond to chemotherapy and is currently in a clinical trial of alectinib. This is the fourth reported case of MPM with STRN-ALK fusion. Of the 45 cancer cases with STRN-ALK fusion in which the fusion partners were examined, all cases except for the current case showed fusion of exon 3 of STRN and exon 20 of ALK. This is the first case with fusion of exon 2 of STRN and exon 20 of ALK. Further advances in cancer genomic medicine may help clarify the clinical significance of this new fusion. KEY POINTS: Malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas (MPMs) can occur in young women without asbestos exposure and show fusion genes that activate anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) by gene rearrangement. ALK rearrangement and the fusion partner can be detected by companion diagnostics and by next generation sequencing. Patients with MPMs with ALK rearrangement may benefit from target therapy.

  © 2021 AlphaMed Press.

• Cyclin Pathway Genomic Alterations Across 190,247 Solid Tumors: Leveraging Large-Scale Data to Inform Therapeutic Directions. D.L. Jardim, S.Z. Millis, J.S. Ross, et al. 2021;26(1):e78-e89. PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Background: We describe the landscape of cyclin and interactive gene pathway alterations in 190,247 solid tumors.

  Methods: Using comprehensive genomic profiling (315 genes, >500× coverage), samples were analyzed for alterations in activating/sensitizing cyclin genes (CDK4 amplification, CDK6 amplification, CCND1, CCND2, CCND3, CDKN2B [loss], CDKN2A [loss], SMARCB1), hormone genes (estrogen receptor 1 [ESR1], androgen receptor [AR]), and co-alterations in genes leading to cyclin inhibitor therapeutic resistance (RB1 and CCNE1).

  Results: Alterations in at least one cyclin activating/sensitizing gene occurred in 24% of malignancies. Tumors that frequently harbored at least one cyclin alteration were brain gliomas (47.1%), esophageal (40.3%) and bladder cancer (37.9%), and mesotheliomas (37.9%). The most frequent alterations included CDKN2A (13.9%) and CDKN2B loss (12.5%). Examples of unique patterns of alterations included CCND1 amplification in breast cancer (17.3%); CDK4 alterations in sarcomas (12%); CCND2 in testicular cancer (23.4%), and SMARCB1 mutations in kidney cancer (3% overall, 90% in malignant rhabdoid tumors). Alterations in resistance genes RB1 and CCNE1 affected 7.2% and 3.6% of samples. Co-occurrence analysis demonstrated a lower likelihood of concomitant versus isolated alterations in cyclin activating/sensitizing and resistance genes (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; p < .001), except in colorectal, cervical, and small intestine cancers. AR and cyclin activating/sensitizing alterations in prostate cancer co-occurred more frequently (vs. AR alterations and wild-type cyclin activating/sensitizing alterations) (OR, 1.79; p < .001) as did ESR1 and cyclin activating/sensitizing alterations in breast (OR, 1.62; p < .001) and cervical cancer (OR, 4.08; p = .04) (vs. ESR1 and cyclin wild-type activating/sensitizing alterations).

  Conclusion: Cyclin pathway alterations vary according to tumor type/histology, informing opportunities for targeted therapy, including for rare cancers.

  Implications For Practice: Cyclin pathway genomic abnormalities are frequent in human solid tumors, with substantial variation according to tumor site and histology. Opportunities for targeted therapy emerge with comprehensive profiling of this pathway.

  © 2020 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

• A Phase II Study of Pazopanib in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: NCCTG N0623 (Alliance). K. Parikh, S.J. Mandrekar, K. Allen-Ziegler, et al. 2020;25(6):523-531. PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Purpose: Preclinical and clinical data have shown promise in using antiangiogenic agents to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We conducted this phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent pazopanib in patients with MPM.

  Materials And Methods: Patients with MPM who had received 0-1 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible to receive pazopanib at a dose of 800 mg daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6), with a preplanned interim analysis for futility. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PFS, adverse events assessment and clinical benefit (complete response, partial response [PR], and stable disease [SD]).

  Results: Thirty-four evaluable patients were enrolled, with a median age of 73 years (49-84). The trial was closed early because of lack of efficacy at the preplanned interim analysis. Only 8 patients (28.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.2-48.7%) in the first 28 evaluable were progression-free at 6 months. PFS6 was 32.4% (95% CI, 17.4-50.5). There were 2 PR (5.9%) and 16 SD (47.1%). The overall median PFS and OS were 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.0-6.0) and 11.5 months (95% CI: 5.3-18.2), respectively. The median PFS and OS for the previously untreated patients was 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.7-8.5) and 16.6 months (95% CI, 6.6-30.6), respectively; and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.3-4.2) and 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-11.9), respectively, for the previously treated patients. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 23 patients (67.6%).

  Conclusion: Single-agent pazopanib was poorly tolerated in patients with MPM. The primary endpoint of PFS6 was not achieved in the current study. ClinicalTrials.gov identification number. NCT00459862.

  Implications For Practice: Single-agent pazopanib did not meet its endpoint in this phase II trial in malignant mesothelioma. Pazopanib is well tolerated in mesothelioma patients with a manageable toxicity profile. There is a need to better identify signals of angiogenesis that can be targeted in mesothelioma. Encouraging findings in frontline treatment warrant further investigations in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy.

  © AlphaMed Press 2019.

• A Phase II Trial of Alisertib (MLN8237) in Salvage Malignant Mesothelioma. C.M. Gay, Y. Zhou, J.J. Lee, et al. 2020;25(10):e1457-e1463. PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Lessons Learned: Treatment with the Aurora kinase A inhibitor yields often durable disease control, but limited tumor regression, in heavily pretreated patients with unresectable malignant pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma. In a limited sample size, MYC copy-number gain or gene amplification, a candidate predictive biomarker for alisertib, did not correlate with improved response numbers or patient outcomes.

  Background: Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive disease for which few effective therapies are available. The Aurora family kinases are critical for mitotic fidelity and highly expressed in mesothelioma, wherein their inhibition leads to growth arrest in vitro. We evaluated the efficacy of alisertib, an Aurora A kinase inhibitor, in relapsed malignant mesothelioma.

  Methods: Twenty-six patients with previously treated, unresectable pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma were enrolled on a single-arm, single-institution phase II trial of alisertib at a dosage of 50 mg twice daily for 7 of every 21 days. The primary endpoint was 4-month disease control rate. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate, progression free survival, overall survival, safety/toxicity, and correlation of endpoints with MYC copy number.

  Results: Of the 25 evaluable patients treated on study, 8 (32%) experienced 4-month disease control, surpassing the futility endpoint. There were no confirmed partial or complete responses. Median progression-free and overall survival were 2.8 months and 6.3 months, respectively. No associations between MYC copy number and outcomes were observed.

  Conclusion: Alisertib has modest activity in this unselected malignant mesothelioma population. Several patients achieved durable disease control. Although the study did meet its prespecified futility endpoint, the sponsor elected to close the trial at the interim analysis.

  © 2020 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

2010s

• Integration of Tumor-Treating Fields into the Multidisciplinary Management of Patients with Solid Malignancies. Y. Wang, M. Pandey, M.T. Ballo. 2019;24(12):e1426-e1436. Review PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are a noninvasive antimitotic cancer treatment consisting of low-intensity alternating electric fields delivered to the tumor or tumor bed via externally applied transducer arrays. In multiple in vitro and in vivo cancer cell lines, TTFields therapy inhibits cell proliferation, disrupts cell division, interferes with cell migration and invasion, and reduces DNA repair. Human trials in patients with primary glioblastoma showed an improvement in overall survival, and trials in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma showed favorable outcomes compared with historical control. This led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in both clinical situations, paving the way for development of trials investigating TTFields in other malignancies. Although these trials are ongoing, the existing evidence suggests that TTFields have activity outside of neuro-oncology, and further study into the mechanism of action and clinical activity is required. In addition, because TTFields are a previously unrecognized antimitotic therapy with a unique mode of delivery, the oncological community must address obstacles to widespread patient and provider acceptance. TTFields will likely join surgery, systemic therapy, and radiation therapy as a component of multimodality management of patients with solid malignancies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) exhibit a broad range of antitumor activities. Clinically, they improve overall survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The emergence of TTFields has changed the treatment regimen for glioblastoma. Clinicians need to understand the practical issues surrounding its use in the multidisciplinary management of patients with glioblastoma. With ongoing clinical trials, TTFields likely will become another treatment modality for solid malignancies.

  © 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

• Validation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate Endpoint for Overall Survival in Malignant Mesothelioma: Analysis of Cancer and Leukemia Group B and North Central Cancer Treatment Group (Alliance) Trials. X. Wang, X. Wang, L. Hodgson, et al. 2017;22(2):189-198. PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether progression-free survival (PFS) can be considered a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in malignant mesothelioma.

  Materials And Methods: Individual data were collected from 15 Cancer and Leukemia Group B (615 patients) and 2 North Central Cancer Treatment Group (101 patients) phase II trials. The effects of 5 risk factors for OS and PFS, including age, histology, performance status (PS), white blood cell count, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk score, were used in the analysis. Individual-level surrogacy was assessed by Kendall's tau through a Clayton bivariate Copula survival (CBCS) model. Summary-level surrogacy was evaluated via the association between logarithms of the hazard ratio (log HR)-log HROS and log HRPFS-measured in R2 from a weighted least-square (WLS) regression model and the CBCS model.

  Results: The median PFS for all patients was 3.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-3.5 months) and the median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI, 6.5-8.0 months). Moderate correlations between PFS and OS were observed across all risk factors at the individual level, with Kendall's tau ranging from 0.46 to 0.47. The summary-level surrogacy varied among risk factors. The Copula R2 ranged from 0.51 for PS to 0.78 for histology. The WLS R2 ranged from 0.26 for EORTC and PS to 0.67 for age.

  Conclusions: The analyses demonstrated low to moderate individual-level surrogacy between PFS and OS. At the summary level, the surrogacy between PFS and OS varied significantly across different risk factors. With a short postprogression survival and a moderate correlation between PFS and OS, there is no evidence that PFS is a valid surrogate endpoint for OS in malignant mesothelioma. The Oncologist 2017;22:189-198Implications for Practice: For better disease management and for more efficient clinical trial designs, it is important to know if progression-free survival (PFS) is a good surrogate endpoint for overall survival in malignant mesothelioma. With a relatively large database of 17 phase II trials and 716 patients from Cancer and Leukemia Group B and North Central Cancer Treatment Group, we conducted statistical analyses and found that there is no evidence to suggest that PFS is a valid surrogate endpoint for OS for malignant mesothelioma. Future research work is needed to find alternative surrogate endpoints for OS.

  © AlphaMed Press 2017.

• Medically induced euthyroid hypothyroxinemia may extend survival in compassionate need cancer patients: an observational study. A. Hercbergs, R.E. Johnson, O. Ashur-Fabian, et al. 2015;20(1):72-6. PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Background: Clinical studies have shown that interventional lowering of serum free thyroxine (FT4) may be associated with extended survival in patients with some terminal cancers. The report of success with this approach in glioblastoma multiforme caused involvement of the author (A.H.) in the prospective consultative management of 23 end-stage solid tumor patients in whom hypothyroxinemia was induced to prolong life.

  Patients And Methods: Patients were self-referred or recommended by attending physicians to the author (A.H.) and had advanced cancers of the brain, ovary, lung, pancreas, salivary gland, and breast or had mesothelioma or soft-tissue sarcoma. Hypothyroxinemia was achieved in euthyroid patients by using methimazole, with the addition of 3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine (L-T3) to prevent hypothyroidism and suppress endogenous thyrotropin (TSH). In patients with pre-existent primary hypothyroidism, T3 administration was substituted for T4 replacement. Serum FT4 and TSH concentrations were serially monitored to enable adjustments to drug therapy and prevent clinical hypothyroidism. Survival was measured from the date of hypothyroxinemia induction with T3 or methimazole plus T3. Outcomes were compared with the odds of death based on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results and American Joint Committee on Cancer databases and literature reports.

  Results: The survival time of 83% (19 of 23) of patients exceeded the 20% expected 1-year survival for this hypothyroxinemic, end-stage cancer group. The difference between actual and expected survival was significant.

  Conclusion: Although this is an uncontrolled observational experience with frank limitations, compassionate medical induction of hypothyroxinemia should be considered for patients with advanced cancers to whom other avenues of treatment are closed.

  ©AlphaMed Press.

• 6-thioguanine: a drug with unrealized potential for cancer therapy. P.N. Munshi, M. Lubin, J.R. Bertino. 2014;19(7):760-5. Review PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Sixty years ago, 6-thioguanine (6-TG) was introduced into the clinic. We suggest its full potential in therapy may not have been reached. In this paper, we contrast 6-TG and the more widely used 6-mercaptopurine; discuss 6-TG metabolism, pharmacokinetics, dosage and schedule; and summarize many of the early studies that have shown infrequent but nevertheless positive results with 6-TG treatment of cancers. We also consider studies that suggest that combinations of 6-TG with other agents may enhance antitumor effects. Although not yet tested in man, 6-TG has recently been proposed to treat a wide variety of cancers with a high frequency of homozygous deletion of the gene for methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), often codeleted with the adjacent tumor suppressor CDKN2A (p16). Among the cancers with a high frequency of MTAP deficiency are leukemias, lymphomas, mesothelioma, melanoma, biliary tract cancer, glioblastoma, osteosarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, neuroendocrine tumors, and lung, pancreatic, and squamous cell carcinomas. The method involves pretreatment with the naturally occurring nucleoside methylthioadenosine (MTA), the substrate for the enzyme MTAP. MTA pretreatment protects normal host tissues, but not MTAP-deficient cancers, from 6-TG toxicity and permits administration of doses of 6-TG that are much higher than can now be safely administered. The combination of MTA/6-TG has produced substantial shrinkage or slowing of growth in two different xenograft human tumor models: lymphoblastic leukemia and metastatic prostate carcinoma with neuroendocrine features. Further development and a clinical trial of the proposed MTA/6-TG treatment of MTAP-deficient cancers seem warranted.

  ©AlphaMed Press.

• Current issues in malignant pleural mesothelioma evaluation and management. J. Ai, J.P. Stevenson. 2014;19(9):975-84. PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon disease most often associated with occupational asbestos exposure and is steadily increasing in worldwide incidence. Patients typically present at an older age, with advanced clinical stage and other medical comorbidities, making management quite challenging. Despite great efforts, the prognosis of MPM remains poor, especially at progression after initial treatment. Macroscopic complete resection of MPM can be achieved through extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or extended (ie, radical) pleurectomy (e-P/D) in selected patients and can result in prolonged survival when incorporated into a multimodality approach. Given the morbidity associated with surgical resection of MPM, optimizing identification of appropriate patients is essential. Unfortunately, most patients are not candidates for EPP or e-P/D due to advanced stage, age, and/or medical comorbidity. Pemetrexed and platinum combination chemotherapy has become the cornerstone of therapy for patients with unresectable disease because the combination is associated with improved survival and quality of life in treated patients. However, MPM eventually becomes resistant to initial therapy, and benefit to further lines of therapy has not been substantiated in randomized clinical trials. Translational research has provided exciting insights into tumorigenesis, biomarkers, and immune response in MPM, leading to the development of multiple novel therapeutic agents that are currently in clinical trials. These advances hold the promise of a new era in the treatment of MPM and suggest that this disease will not be left behind in the war on cancer.

  ©AlphaMed Press.

• The need for randomized trials in mesothelioma: let's walk the talk. T. Treasure, S. Senan. 2011;16(3):261-3. Comment · Editorial PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Randomized trials are not impossible but present considerable challenges and should be used selectively, alongside other forms of evidence, to guide practice in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

• What is the role of radiotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma?. A. Price. 2011;16(3):359-65. Review PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

  Abstract

  Objective: A review of the evidence supporting the use of radiotherapy in patients with mesothelioma was performed.

  Methods: Relevant publications were searched for on Medline.

  Results: In a Medline search on radiotherapy and mesothelioma, 611 hits were obtained. A limited number of prospective phase II trials of radiotherapy as part of trimodality protocols for early disease and in the palliation of pain were found, along with three small randomized controlled trials of port-site prophylaxis.

  Conclusion: No randomized data exist to support the use of radiotherapy after radical surgery, although there are a large number of publications describing its use as an integral part of therapy, including seven phase II studies. One ongoing trial is randomizing patients to radiotherapy or not after extrapleural pneumonectomy. None of these studies provided any assessment of radiotherapy independent of the other modalities investigated, nor did any formally assess intensity-modulated radiotherapy. There have been several reports of excessive toxicity with this technique, and its use should be limited to phase I studies until the basis of this toxicity is better understood. Three trials have looked at port-site prophylaxis, one supporting its use and two showing no evidence of benefit. Two studies addressed pain control prospectively, one showing definite but short-lived benefits. Implications. Radiotherapy is widely used in treating mesothelioma with little supporting evidence. More randomized trials are required to justify this use in all three common settings for its use.

2000s

• Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma in an asbestos-exposed population: baseline results of a prospective, nonrandomized feasibility trial--an Alpe-adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary Group Study (ATOM 002). G. Fasola, O. Belvedere, M. Aita, et al. 2007;12(10):1215-24. PubMed · Publisher

  Abstract

  Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for the early diagnosis of lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma in an asbestos-exposed population.

  Methods: Between February 2002 and October 2003, 1,045 volunteers already enrolled in a surveillance program for asbestos-exposed workers and former workers were recruited. The main eligibility criteria were: written informed consent, definite exposure to asbestos, age 40-75, no prior cancer or severe concomitant conditions, no chest CT scan in the past 2 years. A smoking history was not required. After a structured interview, chest X-ray (CXR) and LDCT were performed. Participants with negative examinations were assigned to annual LDCT. Participants with positive findings received high-resolution CT and additional diagnostic workup as appropriate.

  Results: Baseline characteristics of the screened population were: median asbestos exposure time, 30 years; median age, 58; median pack-years in smokers/former smokers, 18.5. Thirty-four percent had never smoked. On LDCT, 834 noncalcified nodules were identified in 44% of participants, versus 43 nodules in 4% on CXR. Pleural abnormalities were observed in 44% and 70% of participants by CXR and LDCT, respectively. Overall, LDCT identified nine cases of non-small cell lung cancer-eight stage I, one stage IIA-and one thymic carcinoid, corresponding to 1% of the enrolled population. All cases were radically treated. None had been detected by CXR. No pleural mesothelioma was diagnosed. There were 11 false-positive results.

  Conclusions: Our findings first suggest that LDCT may be at least as useful in asbestos workers as in heavy smokers for the early diagnosis of lung cancer; this benefit is evident even in a poor-risk population, with low rates of smoking prevalence and a previous history of radiological surveillance. The role of spiral tomography in screening for pleural mesothelioma remains uncertain.

• Pemetrexed disodium: a novel antifolate clinically active against multiple solid tumors. A.R. Hanauske, V. Chen, P. Paoletti, et al. 2001;6(4):363-73. Review PubMed · Publisher

  Abstract

  Pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA), "pemetrexed") is a novel, multi-targeted antifolate that has demonstrated promising clinical activity in a wide variety of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung, breast, mesothelioma, colorectal, pancreatic, gastric, bladder, cervix, and head and neck. Pemetrexed inhibits multiple folate-dependent enzymes involved in both purine and pyrimidine synthesis including thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase, and aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. As a single agent, pemetrexed exhibits a moderate toxicity profile at a dose of 500 mg/m(2) by 10-minute infusion once every 21 days with myelosuppression being the dose-limiting toxicity. Folic acid added to the diet in preclinical studies reduced toxicities while maintaining antitumor activity. Based on this observation and clinical toxicities, folic acid and vitamin B(12) dietary supplementation has been recently introduced into all ongoing trials. Studies combining pemetrexed with other active chemotherapeutic agents demonstrate that these combination therapies may become important treatment regimens in a variety of cancer types. Currently, pemetrexed phase III trials are ongoing in mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer with future trials planned to explore this unique multitargeted antifolate.

Browse every journal in the library or the library by type of article, or return to medical research.