No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Union Carbide Corporation's Responses to Plaintiff George Pena's Requests for Disclosure, Boehl v. Owens Corning (2001)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

Union Carbide Corporation's responses, filed in Boehl v. Owens Corning Corp. (Dallas County, Texas, 192nd District Court), to Plaintiff George Pena's Requests for Disclosure. The responses state Union Carbide's general defenses and refer to attached witness and exhibit lists (Exhibits A-D). The OCR text covers pages 1-40 and 109-113 of the 113 pages.

Author
Brent M. Karren (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.); Misti D. Mosteller (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.)
Published by
Union Carbide Corporation (defendant), by counsel DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.
Series
Union Carbide documents, UC-2001
Date
March 2001
Library no.
ACL Doc 17030 · asbestosclaims.law/library/17030
Rights
A document from asbestos litigation, published for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Document UC-2001 · 113 pages · 4.7 MB

What the document holds

  • Pages 1-2: Union Carbide's responses to George Pena's Requests for Disclosure, signature block and certificate of service dated March 2001
  • Pages 3-5: Responses to individual disclosure items: defenses, damages, persons with knowledge, experts, insurance, witness statements, medical records
  • Pages 6-7: Exhibit A: Union Carbide potential fact/expert witnesses (Bakelite resin and labeling witnesses, outside experts)
  • Pages 8-23: Exhibit B: Defendants' list of potential deposition and trial testimony, with line and page designations
  • Pages 24-40: Exhibit C: CCR Defendants' general list of medical, state-of-the-art, economic, liability and damage experts (entries 1-34 in the pages provided)
  • Pages 109-113: Exhibit D: CCR Defendants' Exhibit List dated November 22, 1994 (items 698-726, published articles and WHO/IARC monographs)

People and organizations

From Brent M. Karren (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.); Misti D. Mosteller (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.) to Russell Budd (Counsel of record for Plaintiff, Baron & Budd, P.C.).

Pages on our site about what this document covers: New Jersey Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage · Owens-Corning Fiberglas.

About this copy

This is document UC-2001 of the Union Carbide documents, documents produced and used as evidence in asbestos lawsuits against Union Carbide, 113 pages. The same document is also document UC-2002, UC-2003, UC-2035.

Cite this document

Brent M. Karren (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.), Misti D. Mosteller (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.). “Union Carbide Corporation's Responses to Plaintiff George Pena's Requests for Disclosure, Boehl v. Owens Corning.” March 2001. Union Carbide documents, UC-2001. Union Carbide Corporation (defendant), by counsel DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 17030. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/17030.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a free case review

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.