You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
Union Carbide Corporation's responses to plaintiff George F. Kutach's requests for disclosure in Rutherford et al. v. Owens Corning Corp. et al., Cause No. DV 99-06746-K, Dallas County, Texas. The responses state the company's general defenses and incorporate attached witness, expert and exhibit lists. Exhibits A through D include Union Carbide's potential fact witnesses, defendants' deposition and trial testimony designations, a general expert list, and a 1994 exhibit list of published literature.
- Author
- Brent M. Karren (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.); Misti D. Mosteller (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.)
- Published by
- Union Carbide Corporation (Defendant), through counsel DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.
- Series
- Union Carbide documents, UC-2035
- Date
- April 6, 2001
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 17062 · asbestosclaims.law/library/17062
- Rights
- A document from asbestos litigation, published for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Document UC-2035 · 114 pages · 5.0 MB
What the document holds
- Pages 1-2: Responses to Requests for Disclosure (signature page and certificate of service dated April 6, 2001)
- Pages 3-5: Text of responses to disclosure requests (b) through (k): defenses, persons with knowledge, experts, insurance, witness statements, medical records
- Pages 6-7: Exhibit A: Union Carbide potential fact/expert witnesses (Bakelite resin and labeling witnesses, outside experts)
- Pages 8-23: Exhibit B: Defendants' list of potential deposition and trial testimony, with line and page designations
- Pages 24-40: Exhibit C (begins): CCR Defendants' general list of medical, state-of-the-art, economic, liability and damage experts, items 1-32
- Pages 110-114: Exhibit D (end): CCR Defendants' Exhibit List dated November 22, 1994, items 698-726 (W-Z authors)
People and organizations
From Brent M. Karren (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.); Misti D. Mosteller (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.) to Russell Budd (Counsel of record for Plaintiff, Baron & Budd, P.C.).
- Brent M. Karren (author)
- Misti D. Mosteller (author)
- Russell W. Budd (recipient)
- Union Carbide Corporation (its organization)
- 162nd Judicial District Court (named)
- Baron & Budd (named)
- DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P (named)
- Harvard University (named)
- Llandough Hospital (named)
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas (named)
Related pages
Pages on our site about what this document covers: New Jersey Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage · Owens-Corning Fiberglas.
About this copy
This is document UC-2035 of the Union Carbide documents, documents produced and used as evidence in asbestos lawsuits against Union Carbide, 114 pages. The same document is also document UC-2001, UC-2002, UC-2003, UC-2044.
Cite this document
Brent M. Karren (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.), Misti D. Mosteller (Counsel for Defendant, DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.). “Union Carbide Corporation's Responses to George F. Kutach's Requests for Disclosure, Rutherford v. Owens Corning.” April 6, 2001. Union Carbide documents, UC-2035. Union Carbide Corporation (Defendant), through counsel DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 17062. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/17062.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.