You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
Union Carbide Corporation's responses to a plaintiff's Requests for Disclosure in Holick v. Owens Corning Corp., Cause No. DV 99-00822-I, 162nd District Court, Dallas County, Texas. The responses state general defenses (including a state-of-the-art defense and smoking causation) and attach Exhibits A through D: witness lists, a list of deposition and trial testimony with line and page designations, a list of defense experts, and an exhibit list. Only pages 1-40 and 109-113 were provided.
- Author
- BRENT M. KARREN (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., counsel for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation); MISTI D. MOSTELLER (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., counsel for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation)
- Published by
- Union Carbide Corporation (defendant), through counsel DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P.
- Series
- Union Carbide documents, UC-2002
- Date
- March 2001
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 17031 · asbestosclaims.law/library/17031
- Rights
- A document from asbestos litigation, published for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Document UC-2002 · 113 pages · 4.7 MB
What the document holds
- Pages 1-5: Union Carbide's responses to Requests for Disclosure, with certificate of service dated March 2001
- Pages 6-7: Exhibit A: Union Carbide potential fact/expert witnesses (Bakelite resin, labeling committee, mineralogists, pathologist)
- Pages 8-23: Exhibit B: Defendants' list of potential deposition and trial testimony, with line and page designations
- Pages 24-40: Exhibit C: CCR Defendants' general list of medical, state-of-the-art, economic, liability and damage experts (items 1-34 shown; remainder not sent)
- Pages 109-113: Exhibit D: CCR Defendants' Exhibit List, November 22, 1994 (entries 698-726, medical and scientific literature, Weill through Ziskind)
People and organizations
From BRENT M. KARREN (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., counsel for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation); MISTI D. MOSTELLER (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., counsel for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation) to Mr. Russell Budd (counsel of record for Plaintiff, Baron & Budd, P.C.).
- Brent M. Karren (author)
- Misti D. Mosteller (author)
- Russell W. Budd (recipient)
- Union Carbide Corporation (its organization)
- 162nd Judicial District Court (named)
- Baron & Budd (named)
- DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P (named)
- Harvard University (named)
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas (named)
Related pages
Pages on our site about what this document covers: Asbestos-Reinforced Plastics: Circuit Breakers, Switchgear, and Resin Pipe · New Jersey Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage · Owens-Corning Fiberglas.
About this copy
This is document UC-2002 of the Union Carbide documents, documents produced and used as evidence in asbestos lawsuits against Union Carbide, 113 pages. The same document is also document UC-2001, UC-2003, UC-2035, UC-2044.
Cite this document
BRENT M. KARREN (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., counsel for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation), MISTI D. MOSTELLER (DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P., counsel for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation). “Union Carbide Corporation's Responses to Plaintiff Thermon Dillion Carroll's Requests for Disclosure, Holick v. Owens Corning.” March 2001. Union Carbide documents, UC-2002. Union Carbide Corporation (defendant), through counsel DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 17031. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/17031.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.