315 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 8 of 16
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 9, 2000
Union Carbide's Responses to Plaintiff Arnold Wiley's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admissions, Campbell v. Owens Corning, Brazoria County, Texas (2000)
Union Carbide's written responses in Cause No. 4886 (149th District Court, Brazoria County, Texas) to a plaintiff's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission. It raises general objections, states that its responses…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 25, 2000
Shawn W. Golden (Powers & Frost) to Russell W. Budd (Baron & Budd) Transmitting Union Carbide Discovery Responses, with Union Carbide's Responses to Request for Disclosure, Jacobs v. Owens-Corning (2000)
A cover letter from defense counsel to plaintiffs' counsel in a Calhoun County, Texas asbestos case lists three enclosed sets of Union Carbide discovery responses. The exhibit also includes Union Carbide Chemical & Plastics Co., Inc.'s responses to…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · March 30, 2001
Union Carbide's Answers and Objections to Thermon Dillon Carroll's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Holick v. Owens-Corning (2001)
Union Carbide's written answers and objections in a Dallas County, Texas asbestos suit to plaintiff Thermon Dillon Carroll's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission. The responses concern Carroll's alleged presence…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · June 6, 2001
Union Carbide's Third Amended Answers to Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission in Rehak v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Werzecha), Seadrift Facility (2001)
Union Carbide's third amended responses and objections to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission in Cause No. 98-4-13362, Calhoun County, Texas. The responses address asbestos-containing…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · July 2000
Union Carbide Chemical & Plastics Co., Inc.'s Responses to Plaintiffs' Request for Disclosure, Campbell et al. v. Owens Corning et al. (2000)
Union Carbide Chemical & Plastics Co., Inc.'s responses to a Request for Disclosure in Campbell et al. v. Owens Corning et al., No. 4886RM98, 149th Judicial District, Brazoria County, Texas. The filing has a signature page…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · May 2001
Union Carbide Corporation's Responses to Plaintiffs' Request for Disclosure, with Witness and Expert Lists, Murphy v. Owens-Corning (2001)
Union Carbide's responses to plaintiffs' request for disclosure in Malcom Lee Murphy, Jr., et al. v. Owens-Corning, et al., Cause No. CC-99-08033-B, Dallas County, Texas, served by certified mail in May…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · April 6, 2001
Union Carbide Corporation's Responses to George F. Kutach's Requests for Disclosure, Rutherford v. Owens Corning (2001)
Union Carbide Corporation's responses to plaintiff George F. Kutach's requests for disclosure in Rutherford et al. v. Owens Corning Corp. et al., Cause No. DV 99-06746-K, Dallas County, Texas. The responses state…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 1, 2000
Defendants' General List of Medical, State-of-the-Art, Economic, Liability and Damage Experts, Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (2000)
Defendants' expert witness designation filed in Cause No. 90G2055, Moake et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation et al., in the 239th Judicial District Court, Brazoria County, Texas. It lists about 70 numbered medical, pathology, state…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 18, 2000
Union Carbide Chemical & Plastics Co., Inc.'s Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Disclosure, Garcia v. Owens Corning (2000)
Union Carbide Chemical & Plastics Co., Inc.'s responses to the plaintiff's Request for Disclosure in Maria Magdalena Garcia v. Owens Corning et al., Cause No. 99-02-00667-A. The responses state its general defenses…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 2000
Union Carbide's Responses to Robert C. Garcia's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Garcia v. Owens Corning (2000)
Union Carbide's discovery responses in Robert C. Garcia v. Owens Corning, et al., No. 99-09-3763-B, 107th Judicial District Court, Cameron County, Texas. The pages provided contain general objections, a preliminary statement, and…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · May 30, 2001
Union Carbide's Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Rehak v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Seadrift Facility) (2001)
Union Carbide's second amended responses and objections in Eugene A. Rehak et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. et al. (Calhoun County, Texas), answering plaintiff Werzecha's interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 24, 2001
Union Carbide Corporation's Objections and Answers to George F. Kutach's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission, Rutherford v. Owens-Corning (2001)
Union Carbide's written objections and answers to plaintiff George F. Kutach's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission in Cause No. 99-06746-K (Dallas County, Texas), limited to Union Carbide's Seadrift facility. It…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 2000
Union Carbide's Responses to Plaintiff Rafael W. Hany's First Request for Admissions and Second Request for Production, Jacobs v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Calhoun County, Texas (2000)
Union Carbide's written responses in a Calhoun County, Texas asbestos suit to Plaintiff Rafael W. Hany's First Request for Admissions and Second Request for Production. It sets out general objections and a preliminary statement, then answers…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · July 2001
Union Carbide's Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Amelia Sanchez Garcia's First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admissions, Garcia v. Owens-Corning (2001)
Union Carbide's written objections and responses to the plaintiff's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission in a Bexar County, Texas asbestos case brought by the estate of Jose A. Garcia, Jr., who is alleged to have…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 9, 2000
Union Carbide's Responses to Arnold Wiley's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admissions, Campbell v. Owens Corning, Brazoria County, Texas (2000)
Union Carbide's written discovery responses in Cause No. 4886 (149th Judicial District, Brazoria County, Texas), answering a plaintiff's first interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admissions. The pages sent contain general…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 2000
Defendants' List of Potential Deposition and Trial Testimony, Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Brazoria County, Texas (2000)
…90G2055, Weldon R. Moake et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation et al. It lists prior deposition and trial testimony of witnesses, mostly physicians, from other Texas and California asbestos cases that the defendants may use…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · August 2000
Union Carbide's Responses to William J. King's First Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admissions, Jacobs v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (2000)
Union Carbide's discovery responses in Cause No. 97-4-13222, James Paul Jacobs et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation et al., 267th District Court, Calhoun County, Texas, answering plaintiff William J. King's interrogatories…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · December 18, 2003
In re Kensington Intern. Ltd. (2003)
Creditors in two of five asbestos-related Chapter 11 bankruptcies (Owens Corning and W.R. Grace) asked the Third Circuit for writs of mandamus. They wanted District Judge Alfred Wolin removed from the cases because of…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 3, 2008
State EX rel. Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (2008)
…Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals' mandamus grant and held that the Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in naming Pilkington, successor to Libbey Owens Ford's self-insured claims, as the amenable employer…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 8, 2007
State EX rel. Pilkington N. AM. v. Indus. Comm. (2007)
…Apportionment and Settlement Credits Worksites: Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant; Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and Thermopane Plant 9), Rossford laborer, furnace tender, and crew leader Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and…