25 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
The Court of Special Appeals vacated the judgments for the Dixon plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company and remanded for a new trial, because the trial court should not have admitted the plaintiffs' expert's causation opinion…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 25, 2013
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2013)
…the intermediate appellate court, reinstated the jury verdicts for the Dixon plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company, and reversed the trial court's judgment for Ford on its cross-claim against Georgia-Pacific, which won back the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 21, 2017
Fish v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)
The magistrate judge granted in part and denied in part Ford Motor Company's motion for a protective order limiting the plaintiffs' 54 Rule 30(b)(6) areas of inquiry, largely for Ford, allowed the plaintiffs…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
The Court of Special Appeals reversed the judgments for Coates against Mack Trucks and Ford on negligent failure to warn, and reversed the judgments for CertainTeed on Mack's and Ford's cross-claims, remanding for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)
…Weathersby Houff. Warren Pumps, Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by Meggie Hogan, Swanson Martin and Bell, pro hac vice. Ford Motor Company, Inc., ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Michelle Noorani, Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP. Alfa Laval, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)
…Weathersby Houff. Warren Pumps, Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by Meggie Hogan, Swanson Martin and Bell, pro hac vice. Ford Motor Company, Inc., ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Michelle Noorani, Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP. Alfa Laval, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Dugger v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)
…Weathersby Houff. Warren Pumps, Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by Meggie Hogan, Swanson Martin and Bell, pro hac vice. Ford Motor Company, Inc., ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Michelle Noorani, Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP. Alfa Laval, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Dugger v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)
…Inc., Defendant, represented by Pamela Thomas Broache, Goldberg Segalla. Dana Companies, LLC, Defendant, represented by Vincent J. Palmiotto, DeHay & Elliston, LLP & Patrick C. Smith, Dehay and Elliston LLP. Ford Motor Company, Inc., Defendant, represented by Michelle…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2016 · in the opinion
Stein v. Pfizer Inc. (2016)
…law); Ford Motor Co. v. Mathis, 322 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1963) (applying Texas law); Putnam v. Erie City Mfg. Co., 338 F.2d 911 (5th Cir. 1964) (applying Texas law); Standard Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)
…strict liability analysis. Common sense tells us that the pumps were what Respondents sold to the Navy, and the gaskets and packing are included within that product. We have studied Ford Motor Co. v. Wood and…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion
Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)
…Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 125 Ohio St.3d 510, 929 N.E.2d 448 (2010); Campbell v. Ford Motor Co., 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 141 Cal. Rptr.3d 390 (2012); and In re Eighth Judicial…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…Grilli Marcus, Whiteford [\810] Taylor and Preston LLP, R. Thomas Radcliffe, Jr., Patrick C. Smith, Dehay and Elliston LLP, F. Ford Loker, Jr., Joshua Franklin Kahn, Leianne S. McEvoy, Michael L. Haslup, Matthew R. Schroll, Robin…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 12, 2019 · in the opinion
Barrett v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)
…Decking Inc., formerly known as Selby, Battersby & Co., Defendant, represented by F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC. The William Powell Company, Defendant, represented by Vincent J. Palmiotto, Clyde & Co. US LLP. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…and sold by others. The circuit court granted the pump makers summary judgment. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It held that under its earlier decision in Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, and following courts in…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Ament v. John Crane-Houdalille, Inc. (2019)
…court not sustained objections to those questions below. The Aments further assert that "Dr. Frank's testimony and opinions were exactly what was permitted and approved in" Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., 433 Md. 137 (2013)…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)
…of other suppliers. Id. at 209 (footnote omitted). \[5\] We will briefly comment upon an additional matter. On June 29, 2012, this Court filed its opinion in Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., \_\_\_ Md. App. \_\_\_, No. 536…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)
…2017), that courts must "\ensur\[e\] that an expert's testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand.'" (citing Nease v. Ford Motor Co., 848 F.3d 219, 229…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Rhodes v. McIC, Inc. (2016)
…Joshua Franklin Kahn, Michael Alan Brown, Michael L. Haslup, Matthew Thomas Wagman, Alicia N. Ritchie, Jonathan James Huber, F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC, Patrick C. Smith, R. Thomas Radcliffe, Jr., Steven J. Parrott…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Rhodes v. Mcic, Inc. (2017)
…Dehay and Elliston LLP. GTE Products of Connecticut Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by David J. Quigg, Meringer Zois and Quigg LLC…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 24, 2017 · in the opinion
Arbogast v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2017)
…Rubber Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Theodore F. Roberts, Venable LLP, Scott Mason Richmond, Venable LLP & M. Elizabeth O'Neill, Hawkins Parnell Thackston and Young LLP. Georgia-Pacific, LLC, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by F. Ford Loker…