No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

21 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 22, 2010

    Adamson v. General Elec. Co. (2010)

    …Garlock, CBS/Westinghouse, General Electric and Union Carbide (no proof of exposure to their asbestos products), against the estate's executor. To survive summary judgment, a plaintiff must present evidence that the defendant's asbestos-containing…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 21, 2013

    Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation v. AW Chesterton Co., Inc. (2013)

    Seven plaintiffs, or their estates, brought asbestos injury suits in New York County. Six had mesothelioma and one, Perez, had lung cancer. Their cases were part of an "In Extremis" trial group, and they asked for a joint trial. Their alleged…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 8, 2010

    Horn v. A.W. Chesterson Co. (In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2010)

    Ten asbestos cases, brought by plaintiffs represented by the same law firm, were assigned to one New York County judge for trial. Eight of the plaintiffs, alleging mesothelioma, asked the court to consolidate their cases into three groups for joint…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …to Square D for use in the manufacture or assembly of molded or bonded component parts in certain electrical equipment products which may or may not have contained asbestos:... Union Carbide Corporation \[and\] General Electric.... (Id…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hillyer v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation Hillyer, 2016)

    …Shawn Edward Martyniak, Swartz Campbell LLC. Eaton Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Joseph S. Naylor, Swartz Campbell LLC. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Gould Electronics Inc., Cross Defendant…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 6, 2014 · in the opinion

    Smith v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …INC.; SPIRAX SARCO, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation; FLOWSERVE US, INC. a…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion

    Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)

    …The 13 defendants remaining in his action are: American Biltrite, Inc., Burnham, CBS Corp., Conwed Corp., Domco Products Texas, Inc., General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Georgia-Pacific, Grinnell, Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., Mannington Mills, Inc.…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018

    Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)

    …Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1953-1957; boilermaker, truck mechanic, and general helper Thatcher Glass Elmira 1957-1996; fireman USS Des Moines 1957-1961; boiler maintenance mechanic Happauge School District 1976-1982; welder USS Mindoro 1948-1952…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …The court explained that the employer was a "sophisticated organization" and it did not have to be "told that gasoline is volatile and that sparks from an electrical connection or friction can cause ignition." (Ibid.) Subsequently…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 27, 2023 · in the opinion

    Servedio v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2023)

    …OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC, PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER), REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC. FORMERLY KNOWN AS, SLANT/FIN CORPORATION, U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL), UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WEIL-McLAIN, A…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 20, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mosher v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    … Ex. B at 243:7-245:12) He admitted that his work on the fire pump was limited to turning its electric motor on and off, and that he was not present when other individuals performed…

  12. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)

    …Texas City; Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City, Texas City pipefitter and general laborer Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 24, 2017

    Romano v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2017)

    …but reversed the damages ruling and raised the general damages award for the Romanos from $500,000 to $1,500,000. A solidary obligor gets a virile share credit only if the plaintiff released the other…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 20, 2006 · in the opinion

    Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2006)

    Accordingly, we hold that Zachry breached its general duty, under the facts and circumstances of this case, to Mrs. Chaisson by putting her in foreseeable risk [\190] of contracting an asbestos related disease from household exposure…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)

    …must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 15, 2010 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2010)

    …conflicting inference we must ignore. (Kuhn v. Department of General Services (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1627, 1632-1633 \[all reasonable inferences in favor of the judgment must be indulged\].) II. The use of John's…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 12, 2025 · in the opinion

    Alford v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. (2025)

    …Supreme Court in Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. ("Halphen I"): There is general agreement upon the most basic principles of strict tort products liability. In order to recover from a manufacturer, the plaintiff must prove…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)

    …439 S.W.3d 332, 352 (Tex. 2014). Appellants do not dispute general causation. That is, they do not dispute that asbestos is capable of causing mesothelioma. However, each appellant argues that Oscar failed to establish…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · December 21, 2011 · in the opinion

    Carey v. JP Bushnell Packing Supply Company (2011)

    …In deciding this issue, the Court may consider the pleadings and supporting affidavits. Parnas v. General Motors Corp., 879 F.Supp. 91, 92 (E.D.Mo.1995). Discussion Plaintiffs allege Plaintiff John Carey contracted mesothelioma as…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)

    …Expert testimony is required to establish causation, and a court may admit specific-causation evidence only after the plaintiff has produced admissible evidence on general causation. Id. To show specific causation in a toxic tort case…