No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

981 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 17 of 50

  1. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Nichols v. Allis Chalmers Product Liability Trust (2018)

    … CSX Transp., Inc. v. Williams, 608 S.E.2d 208 (Ga. 2005); Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 705 A.2d 58 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1998). Other jurisdictions focus on whether the risk of injury was…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    DeLOOF v. Ace Hardware Corp. (2017)

    …of a cause of action for asbestos-related latent injuries, the plaintiff must first establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  3. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion

    McCoy v. PolyVision Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2012)

    …foreseeability of risk was the primary (if not only) consideration in the duty analysis."\[19\] In Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.\[20\] the New Jersey Supreme Court focused on foreseeability analysis and determined a duty existed…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Markovsky v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. (2014)

    …DAP, Inc., 966 A.2d 603 (Pa.Super.2009) (en banc) (Klein, J., concurring and dissenting) and Burger v. Owens Illinois, Inc., 966 A.2d 611 (Pa.Super.2009) (en banc) (Klein, J., concurring and dissenting)…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    …the ability to establish specific testing relating to a particular plaintiff is exceedingly problematic. See, e.g. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, 941 P.2d 1203, 16 Cal. 4th 953, 957 (Ca.1997).\[5\] It is clear…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2016 · in the opinion

    Stein v. Pfizer Inc. (2016)

    …BALTIMORE CITY AFFIRMED. COSTS TO BE PAID BY APPELLANTS. \[1\] The complaint named the following entities as defendants: Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; General Refractories Company; Koppers Company, Inc.; Universal…

  8. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 8, 2004 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2004)

    …has there been great difficulty and disparity in the courts' definition of "substantial factor." See, e. g., Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. 16 Cal.4th 953, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d 1203 (1997)…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 13, 2006 · in the opinion

    Bartel EX rel. Estate, Rich v. AC Prod. Liab. Tr. (2006)

    …The majority of these cases concerned shipyard workers who worked on ships while in the shipyard on land, as well as at sea.\[2\] Of these cases, only Owens-Illinois Inc. v. United States District Court…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 10, 2017 · in the opinion

    Stallings v. Georgia Pacific Corp. (2017)

    …court subsequently issues a decision contrary to our own, we are required to adopt prospectively the state decision clarifying state law. See Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 311 U.S. 538, 543 (1941) ("appellate tribunals…

  11. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)

    …in Flores we discussed the California Supreme Court's decision in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.\[17\] That case described how expert testimony was presented from both sides establishing "that the plaintiffs' asbestos-related disease [\339…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2017 · in the opinion

    Alfaro v. Imerys Talc America Inc. (2017)

    …would need to establish that this exposure was to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease she suffered. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Burkart v. PPG Industries, Inc. (2018)

    …LLP, Mary Reeves Arthur, Forman, Watkins, & Krutz, LLP & Thomas Peyton Smith, Forman, Watkins, & Krutz, LLP. Owens-Illinois, Inc., doing business as O-I, Third Party Defendant, represented by Walter G. Watkins, III, Forman, Watkins & Krutz LLP…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weber v. John Crane, Inc. (2006)

    …the defendant with enough frequency and regularity as to show a reasonable medical probability that this exposure was a factor in causing the plaintiff's injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 6, 2016 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)

    …and all of the witnesses who would provide testimony regarding the defendant's liability regarding each product. Wolter's notice of deposition in the MDL stated he would provide testimony regarding Owens-Illinois and Pabst. Nevertheless…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 29, 2009 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2009)

    …judgment and for JNOV on appellee's claims. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is evaluated the same way as a motion for judgment at close of the evidence. Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 87 Md…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion

    Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)

    …the Court of Appeals referenced this Court's decision in Adams v. Owens-Illinois, stating that our decision applied "the same policy of avoiding expansive new duties to hold that an employer owed no duty to…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …frequency, regularity, and proximity test'" and consequently applying this causation test to mesothelioma case) (citing Henderson, 644 S.E.2d at 727); Blackmon v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 2011 WL 4790631, at [\1] n. (E.D. Pa…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Sroka v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)

    …Paul Sroka, as plaintiffs. ECF No. 90-3. \[2\] The Plaintiffs also sued Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc.; Hampshire Industries, Inc.; Universal Refractories Company; J…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 15, 1986 · in the opinion

    Dykes v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …969, 99 S.Ct. 461, 58 L.Ed.2d 428 (1978)). In a more recent decision, Murphy v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 779 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985), our court, speaking through Judge Kennedy, upheld the…