No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

1,463 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 26 of 74

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)

    …At the most fundamental level, there is scientific uncertainty regarding the biological mechanisms by which inhalation of certain microscopic fibers of asbestos leads to lung cancer and mesothelioma." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion

    Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)

    …both that he was actually exposed to asbestos-containing materials that were installed by the \[defendants\] and that such exposure was a substantial contributing factor in causing his injuries"); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …frequency, regularity, and proximity test'" and consequently applying this causation test to mesothelioma case) (citing Henderson, 644 S.E.2d at 727); Blackmon v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 2011 WL 4790631, at [\1] n. (E.D. Pa…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Casey v. Perini Corporation (2012)

    …to Present Sufficient Evidence to Raise a Triable Issue of Fact Regarding Causation A threshold issue in asbestos litigation is exposure to the relevant asbestos product. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Green v. CertainTEED Corporation (2015)

    …Step One Turning to step one, California and Texas apply different standards to determine the issue of causation in asbestos litigation. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), sets forth the "substantial…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Assenzio v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2015)

    …2012, prior to the May 28, 2013 commencement date of the trial. As to Owens Illinois in Assenzio, plaintiffs contend they provided information that Mr. Assenzio claimed exposure to asbestos from its products, in responses to…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. AO Smith Corporation (2016)

    …AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ALLIANCE MACHINE COMPANY; NAGLE PUMPS, INC; OAKFABCO, INC.; OGLEBAY NORTON COMPANY, AND ITS DIVISION FERRO ENGINEERING; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; PHELPS DODGE INDUSTRIES, INC; POWELL VALVE COMPANY; POWER PIPING; PREMIER REFRACTORIES, INC.…

  9. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Nichols v. Allis Chalmers Product Liability Trust (2018)

    … CSX Transp., Inc. v. Williams, 608 S.E.2d 208 (Ga. 2005); Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 705 A.2d 58 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1998). Other jurisdictions focus on whether the risk of injury was…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    DeLOOF v. Ace Hardware Corp. (2017)

    …of a cause of action for asbestos-related latent injuries, the plaintiff must first establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  11. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion

    McCoy v. PolyVision Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2012)

    …foreseeability of risk was the primary (if not only) consideration in the duty analysis."\[19\] In Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.\[20\] the New Jersey Supreme Court focused on foreseeability analysis and determined a duty existed…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Markovsky v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. (2014)

    …DAP, Inc., 966 A.2d 603 (Pa.Super.2009) (en banc) (Klein, J., concurring and dissenting) and Burger v. Owens Illinois, Inc., 966 A.2d 611 (Pa.Super.2009) (en banc) (Klein, J., concurring and dissenting)…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  14. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Whelan v. Armstrong International Inc. (2018)

    …Co. and Daniel P. Creed Co. Inc.; NMBFIL INC., f/k/a Bondo Corp.; OWENS-ILLINOIS INC.; PEERLESS INDUSTRIES INC.; PNEUMO-ABEX LLC, individually and as successor to Abex Corp.; PRICE PFISTER INC.; THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE…

  15. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 8, 2007 · in the opinion

    Borg-Warner Corporation v. Flores (2007)

    …such that it could be considered a substantial factor in causing his asbestosis. Union Pump, 898 S.W.2d at 775; see also Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203, 1219 (Cal. 1997). Thus…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    …the ability to establish specific testing relating to a particular plaintiff is exceedingly problematic. See, e.g. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, 941 P.2d 1203, 16 Cal. 4th 953, 957 (Ca.1997).\[5\] It is clear…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2016 · in the opinion

    Stein v. Pfizer Inc. (2016)

    …BALTIMORE CITY AFFIRMED. COSTS TO BE PAID BY APPELLANTS. \[1\] The complaint named the following entities as defendants: Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; General Refractories Company; Koppers Company, Inc.; Universal…

  18. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 8, 2004 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2004)

    …has there been great difficulty and disparity in the courts' definition of "substantial factor." See, e. g., Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. 16 Cal.4th 953, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d 1203 (1997)…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 13, 2006 · in the opinion

    Bartel EX rel. Estate, Rich v. AC Prod. Liab. Tr. (2006)

    …The majority of these cases concerned shipyard workers who worked on ships while in the shipyard on land, as well as at sea.\[2\] Of these cases, only Owens-Illinois Inc. v. United States District Court…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 10, 2017 · in the opinion

    Stallings v. Georgia Pacific Corp. (2017)

    …court subsequently issues a decision contrary to our own, we are required to adopt prospectively the state decision clarifying state law. See Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 311 U.S. 538, 543 (1941) ("appellate tribunals…