No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

199 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 9 of 10

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009 · in the opinion

    Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)

    …deposition, Mr. Burger testified he performed automotive repairs and, from the early 1950's to the early 1980's, he used brakes from Ford, Chrysler, General Motors, Pep Boys, and NAPA stores. Deposition of Jon Burger…

  2. Product

    Asbestos Brakes, Clutches, and Friction Materials

    …Bendix, never went bankrupt: its successor Honeywell is a solvent company that defends these cases in court, and Ford and other still-solvent automakers and friction sellers can likewise be sued directly. A single mechanic's…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    McKinney v. Hobart Bros. Co. (2018)

    …showing not only that Frank himself was qualified but also that his reliance on Dement's work was (1) customary in Frank's field and (2) reasonable. See Connelly v. General Motors Corp., 184 Ill. App…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion

    Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)

    …in brakes sold to end users. Various entities, including Bendix, Ford, and General Motors, purchased asbestos-containing friction material from Abex, [\256] but its most significant business came from Rayloc, which manufactured brake products that were…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2021

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2021)

    The court granted Ford Motor Co.'s motions for summary judgment on causation and punitive damages, dismissing the Dickens plaintiffs' claims against Ford with prejudice. Under Mississippi's frequency, regularity and proximity test with product identification…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 4, 2016 · in the opinion

    Smith v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2016)

    …D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014), reconsidered on other grounds sub nom. Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 9222834 (Dec. 17, 2015).\[2\] Even if Ms. Smith could show…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 28, 2025 · in the opinion

    Beagan v. Akebono Brake Corp. (2025)

    …it was required, based on interstate federalism concerns embodied in the due process clause, to divest itself of its power to render a judgment over them in this case (see Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Wright v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …Corp., Chrysler Corp., Crane Co., Crane Packing, Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Ford Motor Co., Foster Wheeler Corp., Garlock, Inc., General Electric Co., General Motors Corp., Goulds Pumps, Inc., Green Tweed & Co., Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc.…

  9. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)

    …and consequently cannot have an error rate."); Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F.Supp.2d 1217, 1224-1225 (D.Utah 2013) ("every exposure" opinion excluded under Daubert as not testable and having no known error…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …fact exist as to whether the JBP used by Mr. Rothlein was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …2018 WL 3819027, at [\16] (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2018) (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa. 2016)). Nevertheless, as the court in Jack explained, "\[t\]hese \irrefutable scientific fact…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 23, 2018 · in the opinion

    Williams v. the Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack OF California (2018)

    …which occurred "during the 1960's through the mid-1980's." \[17\] "A \shade tree mechanic' is someone who maintains and repairs his vehicles himself." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475…

  13. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · July 1, 2015 · in the opinion

    Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2015)

    …thirteenth juror. See Meals ex rel. Meals v. Ford Motor Co., 417 S.W.3d 414, 420 (Tenn.2013) ("No verdict is valid unless approved by the trial judge acting as the thirteenth juror."). When a…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mettias v. The Pep Boys Manny, Moe & Jack of California (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …evidence." (Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 543 \[138 Cal.Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857\], italics omitted, overruled on different grounds in Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Hilbert v. Aeroquip, Inc. (2007)

    …1988); United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.1986); Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 603, 604-605 (1st Cir.1980); United States v. Vega, 678…

  16. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)

    …232 S.W.3d at 770 (quoting Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton, 898 S.W.2d 773, 775 (Tex. 1995)); see also Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma, 242 S.W.3d 32, 46 (Tex. 2007). Thus…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Erhardt v. Bmw OF North America, LLC (2021)

    …BMW NA Mem. Frank & Zhang at 18-20 (collecting cases); see, e.g., Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F. Supp. 2d 1217, 1225 (D. Utah 2013) (noting that "a growing number of courts have determined…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)

    …S. 592-94. After considering these factors, courts are granted a "broad attitude" to determine admissibility. Clay v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 663, 667 (6th Cir. 2000). Admissibility does not require a perfect methodology…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Strong v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)

    …because the district court has a statutory duty to order a competency hearing where a criminal defendant's mental disease makes him unable to assist properly in his defense) with Kline v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)

    …702. Thus, the trial court should not accept the expert's opinion at face value; it must independently [\179] examine and evaluate the reliability of each expert's opinion. Walker v. Ford Motor Co., 8th Dist.