No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · April 21, 2017

    Walls v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asebestos Litigation, 2017)

    …affirmed the Superior Court's judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding any error in the partial summary judgment on third-party replacement brake parts was harmless because the jury found Ford not negligent. An error in…

  2. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The Delaware Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, its alternative motion for a new trial, and its motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the…

  3. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 3, 2020

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    On remand from the Delaware Supreme Court, the Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the $40.625 million compensatory verdict for Paula Knecht in place. A jury…

  4. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 19, 2013

    Farrall v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2013)

    …plaintiff's motion for reargument, leaving in place its grant of summary judgment for Ford Motor Company on the failure to warn claim about asbestos-containing replacement parts. Under Delaware law, a manufacturer has no duty…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 25, 2019

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    The magistrate judge recommended granting Ford Motor Company's summary judgment motion on the negligence, failure-to-warn and punitive damages claims, because Johansen's brake exposure was de minimis and Ford owed no duty to…

  6. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    …Court affirmed the $2 million jury verdict for Grenier against Ford, upholding the trial court's admission of Grenier's expert causation testimony after remand and rejecting Ford's other claims of error. A trial court…

  7. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. ROLAND LEO GRENIER, SR., Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Nos. 453, 2007, 578, 2007 Submitted: October 29, 2008. Decided: February 4, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware Christian…

  8. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 22, 2019

    Richards v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc. (2019)

    The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for Copes-Vulcan, Ford and Goodyear and the denial of the Richards' request to supplement their expert report or for reargument. Under Ohio law, Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.96…

  9. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 25, 2023

    Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)

    …one of first impression under Ohio law, not Delaware law. Ford would remain in the case regardless, and Hennessy gave no evidence that the issue would affect other cases. The court found no benefit that outweighed…

  10. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 31, 2020 · in the opinion

    Petit v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …Smith, Esq., BALICK & BALICK, LLC, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Megan T. Mantzavinos, Esq., and Eileen M. Ford, Esq., MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION ADAMS…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation Evans v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2017)

    …Defendant, represented by Krista Reale Samis, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Corporation, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Flowserve US Inc. (2017)

    …Texter, Swartz Campbell LLC, Wilmington, DE, Krista Reale Samis, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Wilmington, DE, Eileen M. Ford, Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Wilmington, DE, Jonathan L. Parshall…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C.. Ingersoll Rand Company, Defendant, represented by Jessica Lee Tyler…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Pieno v. Crosby Valve (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …Cross Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. The Fairbanks Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Timothy…