19 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC (2021)
…as successor-by-merger to Durco International and also sued as successor-in-interest to Anchor Darling Valves f/k/a Darling Manufacturing; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; The Gorman-Rupp Company; Goulds Pumps…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)
…Mr. Woolard did not mention Foxboro at all during his deposition, and there is no indication that his general testimony covers instrument features specific to (and therefore capable of identifying) Foxboro products. A second fact witness…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…this work, on its own, leaves only the general possibility that Covil insulation was likewise present. Plaintiffs next argue that Mr. Vinson worked in close proximity to Covil employees who were installing or maintaining insulation. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · August 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Lineberger v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…Erb Dean, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP & Richard T. Boyette, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P.. General Cable Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Stephanie G. Flynn, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, pro hac vice & Timothy Peck, Smith Moore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · August 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Lineberger v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…Erb Dean, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP & Richard T. Boyette, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P.. General Cable Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Stephanie G. Flynn, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, pro hac vice & Timothy Peck, Smith Moore…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · September 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Hinson v. Continental Tire the Americas (2019)
…all 144 claims. The parties agreed that evidence on the general issues was to be part of the record for all \[consolidated cases\], to the extent the evidence was applicable to each \[P\]laintiff's issues…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024
Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)
…general expert evidence that every exposure contributes does not satisfy it. Without compensatory liability, punitive damages fail. Causation; Product Identification; Punitive Damages; Choice of Law; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: General Fertilizer Equipment (Speedy Spread); General…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Young v. 3M Company (2016)
…2013 WL 7088637, at [\6] (allowing limited jurisdictional discovery to determine if the plaintiff's allegation that the defendant sold materials to a company doing business in North Carolina was sufficient to establish general jurisdiction). Therefore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…motion is GRANTED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning specific causation. Defendants' motion is DENIED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning general causation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)
…as already mentioned, Rule 26 provides two exceptions to the general rule that a party may not obtain discovery from another party's consulting expert: "(i) as provided in Rule 35(b); or (ii) on showing…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…the direct and circumstantial evidence discussed herein — including general causation expert testimony to which ZF has not objected — is sufficient on its own to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Strick's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…October 14, 2020, Dr. Staggs sets forth the general principles of asbestos-related disease; discusses the studies and reports identifying a causal relationship between asbestos-containing products and diseases such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…517, 526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Absent a duty to retain destroyed records, there can be no spoliation. IV. Motion to Strike MNRM…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…in 1974 by prohibiting the use of compressed air for cleaning purposes except when reduced to a slow speed and paired with personal protective equipment. Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Equipment, General, 39 Fed. Reg…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…infrequent." Even when taken together with the plaintiffs' evidence of Mr. Logan's general job duties and the large number of Powell valves on site, this is insufficient to draw an inference of exposure from Powell…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · March 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Young v. Agco Corporation (2014)
…the Court need not conduct a de novo review where a party makes only "general and conclusory objections that do not direct the court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…477 U.S. at 257. The moving defendants principally challenge the plaintiffs' evidence of exposure and causation as a general matter without distinguishing between the causes of action. In a case where the plaintiff developed asbestosis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…he was "pretty sure" there were "some Anchor\[ \]" valves there. (See ECF No. 312-1 at 23.) As a general matter, Mr. Draughn testified that "if a valve needed replacing" a supervisor "could send \[a mechanic…