9 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 2, 1987
L. S. Magelssen and H. W. Wegert to J. F. Dodd et al. on Status of Contingency Items for Asbestos Insulation Removal Upgrade, South Charleston (1987)
Two-page memorandum reporting that two contingency items attached to the May 19, 1987 health, safety and environmental endorsement of the South Charleston Asbestos Insulation Removal Upgrade-Phase I had been resolved. It discusses review of the…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · October 30, 1986
H. W. Wegert and G. M. Whipple to J. R. Dement and Others on Health, Safety and Environmental Review of the South Charleston Insulation Upgrade Project (1986)
Memorandum reporting a health, safety and environmental review of a three-year project to remove, replace and seal asbestos insulation at the South Charleston Plant. It recommends endorsement contingent on revising Maintenance Procedure XVIII to…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · October 30, 1986
H. W. Wegert and G. M. Whipple to J. R. Dement et al. on Health, Safety, and Environmental Review of the South Charleston Insulation Upgrade Project (1986)
Memorandum reporting a health, safety and environmental review of a three-year project to upgrade asbestos insulation at the South Charleston Plant. It recommended endorsement contingent on revising Maintenance Procedure XVIII to comply with the…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · November 7, 1986
J. F. Dodd to D. A. Gosselin and Others Transmitting the South Charleston Plant Insulation Asbestos Upgrade Outline of Project (1986)
Cover memo dated November 7, 1986 transmitting for review an Outline of Project for a plantwide asbestos insulation upgrade at the South Charleston, WV plant, described as a high-priority Safety/Health Program. The attached outline describes the…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · October 3, 1986
W. J. Vincent to C. H. Hancock on Equipment Needs for Asbestos Monitoring (1986)
Memo from W. J. Vincent to C. H. Hancock reviewing the Industrial Hygiene Group's needs under the new asbestos standards (1910.1001 and 1926). It states that technicians counting fibers by the NIOSH 7400 method must be trained and certified, that…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · May 19, 1987
L. S. Magelssen and H. W. Wegert to J. R. Dement and Others on Health, Safety and Environmental Review of the South Charleston Asbestos Insulation Removal Upgrade, Phase I (1987)
A May 19, 1987 memo recommending endorsement of Phase I of a project to remove and upgrade asbestos insulation at the South Charleston plant. The endorsement is contingent on revising Maintenance Procedure XVIII to comply with OSHA 29 CFR 1926.58…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 2, 1987
L. S. Magelssen and H. W. Wegert to J. F. Dodd and Others on Status of Contingency Items for Asbestos Insulation Removal Upgrade, South Charleston (1987)
Memorandum reporting that two contingency items attached to the May 19, 1987 endorsement of the South Charleston asbestos insulation removal upgrade (Phase I) had been resolved. It says the February 1987 asbestos maintenance procedures were reviewed…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · May 19, 1987
L. S. Magelssen and H. W. Wegert to J. R. Dement and Others on Health, Safety and Environmental Review of the Asbestos Insulation Removal Upgrade, South Charleston (1987)
Memo recommending endorsement of Phase I of the asbestos insulation removal and upgrade project at the South Charleston plant. It notes that OSHA's 29 CFR 1926.58 rule, promulgated January 16, 1987, raised the cost of removal and repair. Endorsement…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · November 7, 1986
J. F. Dodd to D. A. Gosselin and Others Transmitting the South Charleston Plant Insulation Asbestos Upgrade Outline of Project (1986)
A November 7, 1986 transmittal memo from Joseph F. Dodd circulating the Outline of Project for a plantwide asbestos insulation upgrade at the South Charleston Plant, with a handwritten note asking who would perform the work. The attached outline…