38 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 24, 2019
Rowland v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
The Delaware Superior Court granted Union Carbide's motion for summary judgment against Jane and Douglas Rowland because they could not show that the joint compound they used contained Union Carbide's asbestos. A plaintiff must…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 27, 2017
Shaw v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
The magistrate judge recommended granting Union Carbide's unopposed motion for summary judgment against Ralph and Joan Shaw because Mr. Shaw did not identify a Union Carbide asbestos product. Under Connecticut law, a plaintiff must show…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 11, 2017
In re Asbestos Litigation Sturgill v. 3M Company, Inc. (2017)
The court granted Union Carbide Corporation's motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs Larry and Jill Sturgill because the record did not show Mr. Sturgill was exposed to Union Carbide's asbestos in the joint compounds…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020
Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)
The court granted Union Carbide Corporation's motion for summary judgment on the Gibbses' design-defect and failure-to-warn claims. Under South Carolina law as applied by the court, a raw-material supplier of asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017
Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)
The district court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation and granted the unopposed summary judgment motions of CBS, Crane, Union Carbide, Ingersoll Rand, FMC, McNally and Western Auto Supply against plaintiffs Icom and Johanna Evans. Under…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · April 4, 2018
Kister v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…judgment to Buffalo Pumps, Fairbanks, CertainTeed, Foster Wheeler, Union Carbide, Aurora and Pfizer, because Mr. Kister identified none of their asbestos-containing products and the plaintiff did not respond. Under maritime law, a plaintiff must show…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 20, 2019
Mosher v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting Air & Liquid Systems Corporation's (successor to Buffalo Pumps) motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs Kent and Cathy Mosher because the evidence did not show its pump was a substantial factor…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 30, 2016
Shaw v. Andritz Inc. (2016)
Ralph Shaw and his wife Joan sued Andritz Inc. and other companies in Delaware state court, and CBS Corporation removed the case to federal court. Mr. Shaw developed malignant mesothelioma, which he attributed to asbestos exposure…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 28, 2016
Hillyer v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation Hillyer, 2016)
…BW/IP, Eaton, Union Carbide and Gould against the Hillyers, who did not oppose the motions. Under maritime law, a plaintiff must show exposure to the defendant's own asbestos-containing product that was a substantial…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · November 19, 2019
Mosher v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Pfizer, Siemens, Union Carbide and Warren Pumps) against plaintiffs Kent and Cathy Mosher, who did not respond to the motions. Under maritime law and Colorado law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2016 · in the opinion
Hillyer v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…Inc., Defendant, represented by Antoinette D. Hubbard, Maron Marvel Bradley & Anderson LLC & Paul A. Bradley, Maron Marvel Bradley & Anderson LLC. Union Carbide Corporation, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC & Joseph S. Naylor, Swartz…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Droz v. Hennessy Industries, LLC (2022)
…however, the defendant Union Carbide Corporation ("Union Carbide") sold asbestos fibers that were incorporated into the ready-mix joint compounds. There was no dispute whether the Union Carbide product contained asbestos. The question was whether a…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…and received no direction from Union Carbide personnel while at the Taft facility. Rather, he was employed by different third-party contractors, including Kiewitt Corporation and Stearns Roger Corporation. Union Carbide hired these third-party contractors…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy, Corporation (2016)
…the sake of simplicity, the court only addressed the failure to warn claim, even though plaintiffs asserted additional claims); MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil Action No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Malone v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…the learned intermediary doctrine. For the learned intermediary doctrine to apply, CBS must provide evidence that it provided the "learned intermediary," or the third party purchaser, with information or warning. Union Carbide Corp. v. Nix, Jr.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)
…liability claim, federal courts have subsequently recognized the applicability of the defense to state law failure to warn clams. See, e.g., \McQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del. Dec. 13…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil Action No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Tallman v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil Action No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Cox v. Foster Wheeler (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)
…512 (1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., Mac Queen v. Union Carbide Corp., C.A. No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)
…based on sufficient facts or data for purposes of Fed. R. Evid. 702. Both Plaintiff and JCI rely on the court's decision in MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., 246 F. Supp. 3d 1004 (D. Del…