You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A two-page memo of August 20, 1973, from Dr. George W. Wright, a medical consultant to J-M, to H. Moreno, copied to S. Lane, F. May and J. McKinney, on amosite in J-M's Marinite board and on the Billerica plant. Wright had once suggested removing amosite from Marinite, because Selikoff was citing the Paterson, New Jersey, amosite plant. The United Kingdom had since set a 2 fiber per cc standard for amosite, the same as for chrysotile, and Wright now thought amosite acceptable if workers and users were kept under 2 f/cc, with peaks under 10, "from both a health protection and a medico-legal point of view."
- Author
- George W. Wright
- Sent to
- H. Moreno
- Published by
- Johns-Manville
- Date
- August 20, 1973
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 11237 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11237
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Memo, August 20, 1973 · 2 pages · 102 KB
What it shows
Wright wrote that Billerica "has had one of the poorest health experiences in the Corporation with respect to asbestosis and cancer," explained by past high exposures. Few stations had reached 2 f/cc, "many are still above 5, and too many are much higher than that," and "the conclusion that wearing a mask is being substituted for proper control seems inescapable." He said engineering controls keeping counts below 2 f/cc were "required to assure the health" of Billerica workers, and that if Marinite posed a threat to users who "might be ignorant of potential hazard or inclined to ignore warning labels," the situation "must be remedied."
In Johns-Manville's chronology
Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:
Dr. Wright writes to Moreno on 8/20/73, stating that the U.K. has set a 2 f/cc standard for amosite and chrysotile. "They are of the opinion that amosite is not more toxic than chrysotile." (U.S. standard at this time is 5 f/cc for amosite, crocidolite and chrysotile.) Dr. Wright thinks that the "nature" of the amosite fiber may lead to a greater retention of the inhaled fibers. For this reason, Dr. Wright believes that a TLV for amosite of 2 f/cc would be acceptable from both a health protection and a medico-legal point of view. He realizes that this standard will not be easy to achieve. He then discusses Billerica's poor health experience (5200-5816).
Cited on this site
Cite this document
George W. Wright. “Dr. George W. Wright to H. Moreno on Amosite in Marinite and Conditions at Billerica.” August 20, 1973. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11237. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11237.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.