You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A two-page memo of October 10, 1969, from H. M. Jackson, manager of J-M's industrial health program, to C. B. Burnett, Johns-Manville's president, comparing the plant doctors' readings of workers' chest X-rays with those of Dr. L. J. Bristol of the Saranac Institute at six plants: Manville, Pittsburg, Marrero, Long Beach, Nashua and Waukegan. Taking Bristol's readings as the standard, Jackson found that, except at Manville ("comparable") and Long Beach ("over-reading"), "the plant physicians at these locations are under-reading the X-ray indications of pneumoconioses." A table set out, for each plant, the number of cases and a "potential" workers' compensation total-disability liability, which Jackson called a maximum figure based on "the unlikely assumption that all cases will proceed to total disability": more than $20 million at Manville alone.
- Author
- H. M. Jackson
- Sent to
- C. B. Burnett
- Published by
- Johns-Manville
- Date
- October 10, 1969
- Number
- Bates CP100410272–CP100410273
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 11436 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11436
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Memo, October 10, 1969 · 2 pages · 82 KB
What it shows
Jackson drew a plain conclusion: the data "indicate, however, that past exposure levels, at least, have caused a substantial frequency of disease, and therefore environmental control to the new threshold limits must be obtained rapidly if we are to minimize future disease production and the attendant potential liability." He also pointed to a two-year Tulane University study at Marrero by Dr. Hans Weill. He reported that he and Dr. George W. Wright, a physician advising J-M, had not yet settled on a recommendation for the plant doctors' under-reading, and mentioned better training for plant physicians or having one specialist such as Bristol read all X-rays. Bristol's readings were also sent back to the plants for follow-up (Jackson's November 1969 instructions to Marrero). The Bristol program grew out of his earlier X-ray survey at the Jeffrey mine (Dr. Smith to Dr. Bristol, 1966).
In Johns-Manville's chronology
Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:
Memorandum from Jackson to Burnett, 10/10/69. States that using Dr. Bristol's readings as the criteria, it is apparent that with the exception of Manville and Long Beach the plant physicians are under-reading the x-ray indications of pneumoconiosis. Jackson expresses concern but makes no specific recommendation.
Editor's note: J-M's description says Jackson made no specific recommendation. The memo says a recommendation was still being prepared, but it does urge that dust be brought under the new threshold limits quickly.
Cited on this site
- Asbestos History
- Asbestos Timeline
- C. L. Sheckler to J. D. Anderson on Mass Workmen's Compensation Filings at Manville (1969)
- Dr. George W. Wright, Minutes of the Scientific Relations Subcommittee on X-Ray Findings at Billerica and Manville (1969)
- Dr. Kenneth W. Smith to Dr. Leonard Bristol on an X-Ray Survey at the Jeffrey Mine (1966)
- H. M. Jackson, "X-Ray Study, Dr. L. J. Bristol, Trudeau Institute" (1970)
- H. M. Jackson to J. A. Parks at Marrero on Following Up Dr. Bristol's X-Ray Readings (1969)
- Johns-Manville Report to the Board of Directors on Asbestos and Health (1969)
- Notes of a Discussion with Cliff Sheckler on Dust, Respirators and Disease (1969)
- The Johns-Manville Knowledge Chronology
Cite this document
“H. M. Jackson to C. B. Burnett on Dr. Bristol's X-Ray Readings at Six Plants.” October 10, 1969. Bates CP100410272–CP100410273. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11436. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11436.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.