No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

J. P. Woodard to Kenneth W. Smith on Dr. Lanza's View of Merewether's Paper (1950)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

A one-page confidential memo of March 3, 1950, from J. P. Woodard at J-M's General Headquarters to Dr. Kenneth W. Smith, headed "Asbestosis: Dr. Merewether." The copy is mostly illegible. Woodard reported that he had discussed Merewether's paper with Dr. A. J. Lanza of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, who said of Merewether's opinions, "They just don't hold water." According to J-M's description, Lanza agreed with Smith that mining and milling were "much less likely" to be hazardous than fabricating, and Woodard took up Smith's two recommendations: that Smith review and perhaps publish his own X-ray files, which he was "sure" would be favorable, and that a "qualified authority" study the possible link between asbestosis and lung cancer.

Author
J. P. Woodard
Sent to
Kenneth W. Smith
Published by
Johns-Manville
Date
March 3, 1950
Library no.
ACL Doc 11551 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11551
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Memo, March 3, 1950 · 1 pages · 41 KB

What it shows

Woodard wrote that "Dr. Lanza says he would like to be the agency to undertake this study," and asked Smith to see whether it could be taken on "as an industry proposition." He sent copies of the Merewether paper to Vandiver Brown and A. R. Fisher. This is the start of the 1950 plan for an industry-funded lung cancer study (Smith to Vorwald on Merewether, Smith on Lanza's contract).

In Johns-Manville's chronology

Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:

In a memorandum dated 3/3/50, J.P. Woodard relates to Dr. K. Smith the comment from Dr. A. Lanza that Merewether's opinions "don't hold water." Woodard says Merewether mixes "two phases": the "medical phases" and the phase which gets into "sociological realms." Woodard points out Lanza agrees with Smith that mining and milling processes are undoubtedly "much less likely" to be hazardous in comparison with fabricating processes. Woodard refers to Smith's recommendations that (1) Smith review all x-ray films in his files, correlate them with the working histories of the individuals, and consider publishing the results which Smith is "sure" would be favorable and (2) that some "qualified authority" should do a study regarding the "possible relationship" between asbestosis and lung cancer. Regarding Smith's second recommendation, Woodard states Lanza would like to undertake such a study. Woodard inquires whether the industry might be willing to support such a study. Woodard is sending a copy of Merewether's paper to Brown and Fisher, along with a copy of Woodard's memorandum to Smith.

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“J. P. Woodard to Kenneth W. Smith on Dr. Lanza's View of Merewether's Paper.” March 3, 1950. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11551. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11551.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.