You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A three-page letter of December 11, 1952, from Lloyd A. Carlson of the San Francisco law firm Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro to Herbert Morton Ball, Johns-Manville's secretary, in the compensation case Johns-Manville Products Corporation v. Mrs. Dora Leahy, et al. At a hearing on December 4, a plant employee described working conditions at the Redwood City plant, and Dr. Sydney J. Shipman testified for the insurance companies that Mr. Leahy's death "was due solely to carcinoma." Dr. George H. Houck testified for Mrs. Leahy that death was caused by "the combination of pulmonary fibrosis and bronchogenic carcinoma," and that cancer was more common in patients with long-standing pulmonary fibrosis, citing a 1947 study by Lynch and Cannon of forty fatal cases in which asbestosis was present.
- Author
- Lloyd A. Carlson
- Sent to
- Herbert Morton Ball
- Published by
- Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro
- Date
- December 11, 1952
- Number
- Bates 000127
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 11727 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11727
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Letter, December 11, 1952 · 3 pages · 108 KB
What it shows
Most of the letter concerns which insurer had covered the Redwood City plant in 1935. Employers' Liability Assurance Company would not admit coverage for that year, and the referee said J-M would have to produce the policy, which neither side could find. By 1952 a widow's claim was putting the link between asbestosis and bronchogenic carcinoma before a California compensation referee, with J-M's lawyers reporting the medical testimony to headquarters.
In Johns-Manville's chronology
Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:
Letter to Herbert Morton Ball, Esq., from Lloyd A. Carlson of Pillsbury, Madison and Sutro, 12/11/52 re J-M Products Corporation v. Mrs. Dora Leahy, et al. Carlson informs Ball that Dr. Houck testified on behalf of the plaintiff to the effect that death was caused by the combination of pulmonary fibrous and bronchogenic carcinoma. Dr. Houck also stated that in his opinion there is great incidence of carcinoma in cases where patients have long standing pulmonary fibrosis than otherwise true. His opinion was based in part on the study published by Lynch and Cannon in 1947.
Cited on this site
Cite this document
“Lloyd A. Carlson of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro to Herbert Morton Ball on Testimony in the Leahy Claim.” December 11, 1952. Bates 000127. Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11727. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11727.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.