No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

R. A. Beck of Fibreboard to R. G. Anderson on the Denial of Rehearing in Borel (1974)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

A one-page memo of May 20, 1974, from R. A. Beck of Fibreboard Corporation's legal department to R. G. Anderson, on "Asbestosis Litigation, Borel v. Fibreboard et al." Beck reports that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had affirmed the verdict and judgment of slightly over $60,000 for the plaintiff, had denied the six defendants' motion for rehearing. The only further appeal would be a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, and Dick Von Wald, "who handles asbestosis litigation for Johns-Manville," had offered to canvass the other defendants.

Author
R. A. Beck
Sent to
R. G. Anderson
Published by
Fibreboard Corporation
Date
May 20, 1974
Number
Bates 962007785
Library no.
ACL Doc 11790 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11790
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Memo, May 20, 1974 · 1 pages · 844 KB

What it shows

Beck wrote that "A matter of major importance" was the effect a final decision in Borel might have on future cases: Fibreboard was already a defendant in 14 pending cases, and "We would anticipate a number of new suits after the Borel decision of the Fifth Circuit is publicized." The Borel opinion held the makers of asbestos insulation liable for failure to warn users. Eight months earlier defense counsel had hoped to delay its publication (letter to Weller).

About this copy

This is a Fibreboard memo, not a Johns-Manville one. Fibreboard and J-M were both defendants in Borel, and the memo mentions J-M's Dick Von Wald working with the other defendants, so a copy probably reached J-M through that cooperation, but that is a guess.

In Johns-Manville's chronology

Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:

Final Borel decision on 5/20/74. Asbestos-containing products defective due failure to warn

Editor's note: J-M's description calls this the final Borel decision. The document is a Fibreboard legal department memo reporting that the Fifth Circuit had denied rehearing; the court's opinion itself was issued in September 1973.

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“R. A. Beck of Fibreboard to R. G. Anderson on the Denial of Rehearing in Borel.” May 20, 1974. Bates 962007785. Fibreboard Corporation. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11790. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11790.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.