You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
Fifty-five pages of written statements given at the U.S. Department of Labor's hearings of March 14–17, 1972, on a permanent asbestos standard, all opposing the proposed cut from 5 to 2 fibers per cubic centimeter. Clifford L. Sheckler, speaking for the National Insulation Manufacturers Association and the National Insulation Contractors Association, urged the Secretary of Labor to "Reinstate the Threshold Limit Value for Asbestos Dust at 12 fibres per milliliter" for an interim period. Dr. George W. Wright of St. Luke's Hospital in Cleveland argued that the 5-fiber standard "should not be lowered but left as it is," and Henry B. Moreno, J-M's senior operating vice president, said that adopting 2 fibers "with no scientifically credible evidence" would be "nothing less than complete social irresponsibility."
- Author
- Clifford L. Sheckler; George W. Wright; Henry B. Moreno
- Published by
- Johns-Manville
- Date
- March 16, 1972
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 11850 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11850
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Written statements, March 1972 · 55 pages · 1.7 MB
What it shows
Moreno said J-M supported the emergency standard "if they are modified as suggested by my Johns-Manville associates here today." He told the hearing that about half of J-M's dust stations read over 2 fibers, that meeting that level would cost twelve million dollars in equipment and five million a year to run, and that about eleven hundred workers at five plants would lose their jobs. Wright, formerly of the Saranac Laboratory, was introduced at the hearing by J-M's Fred Pundsack as "our next testifier," and Sheckler was on J-M's corporate safety staff (Pennewell's 1971 memo), though here he spoke for the insulation trade groups. J-M's labeling testimony at the same hearing is Pundsack's, whose file also holds the hearing transcript.
About this copy
The official hearing transcript of the same witnesses is published on separate Library pages: Dr. Wright's testimony, Henry B. Moreno's testimony and the insulation industry witnesses' testimony.
In Johns-Manville's chronology
Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:
J-M Executives/Consultants Sheckler, Wright and Moreno testify in 1972 against proposed reduction of TLV from 5 f/cc to 2 f/cc in the so-called Goldberg hearings before Department of Labor.
Cited on this site
- Asbestos Timeline
- Dennis H. Markusson to R. B. Von Wald on Clifford Sheckler's False Testimony About Rutgers (1982)
- Dr. George W. Wright, Testimony at the Labor Department Hearing on the Asbestos Standard (1972)
- Dr. Paul Kotin to C. G. Linke on Hank Moreno's 1972 OSHA Testimony (1979)
- Fred L. Pundsack's Testimony Against OSHA's Proposed Asbestos Warning Labels, with His Letter to Arthur Goldberg (1972)
- Henry B. Moreno of Johns-Manville, Testimony at the Labor Department Hearing on the Asbestos Standard (1972)
- Insulation Industry Testimony of Sheckler, Royer and Zumwalt at the Labor Department Asbestos Hearing (1972)
- The Johns-Manville Knowledge Chronology
Cite this document
Clifford L. Sheckler, George W. Wright, Henry B. Moreno. “Statements of Clifford Sheckler, Dr. George W. Wright and Henry B. Moreno at the Labor Department Asbestos Hearing.” March 16, 1972. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11850. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11850.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.