You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
Two court filings in James L. Jackson's suit against Armstrong Cork Company and others: a summary exhibit of exposure documents dated March 17, 1982, and filed the next day under Rule 1006 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and a supplemental exhibit dated March 22. Tables list the hull numbers of the ships Jackson worked on at Ingalls Shipbuilding, the insulation subcontractor on each (mostly Shook & Fletcher, Hopeman Brothers and Badham), and the asbestos products used. Johns-Manville appears throughout, for Thermobestos pipe covering and block, cement, Marinite board and cloth.
- Author
- Blatt & Fales; Pate & Peters; Cupit & Maxey
- Published by
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
- Series
- The Motley 1000
- Date
- March 17, 1982
- Numbers
- Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-005025 – 005044; Motley 1000 no. 892
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 13051 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13051
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Court exhibits, March 17 and 22, 1982 · 20 pages · 668 KB
What it shows
The exhibit was the plaintiff's way of tying his own work, ship by ship, to particular products. It drew on his recollection and on time cards produced by Ingalls, and his lawyers noted that not all time cards had yet been produced. A list of the ships built and repaired at Ingalls is Motley document 893.
In Johns-Manville's index
Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:
Summary Exhibit and Supplemental Summary Exhibit of Exposure Documents, filed pursuant to Rule 1006, Federal Rules of Evidence, in James L. Jackson v. Armstrong Cork Company, et al. on 3/18/82 and 3/22/82. The exhibit lists the vessels on which James L. Jackson worked during his employment at Ingalls Shipbuilding, the asbestos-containing products manufactured by the Defendants, and the insulating subcontractors on the vessels on which James L. Jackson worked.
Related documents
About this copy
This is document 892 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-005025 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-005044.
Cited on this site
Cite this document
Blatt & Fales, Pate & Peters, Cupit & Maxey. “Jackson v. Armstrong Cork, Summary Exhibits of Exposure Documents.” March 17, 1982. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-005025 – 005044, Motley 1000 no. 892. U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13051. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13051.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.