You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A two-page Raybestos-Manhattan memo of March 4, 1977, from John H. Marsh, the company's director of environmental affairs, to J. E. Day, Jr., commenting on Day's draft letter to the company's asbestos textile customers. Marsh rewrote two sentences, including one describing fabric dust tests as made "under unusually severe laboratory conditions" that "are not indicative of normal service conditions." He had taken the words "safely" and "safe" out of the last paragraph: "We must avoid the use of this word as a safe level of exposure has not been established."
- Author
- John H. Marsh
- Published by
- Raybestos-Manhattan
- Series
- The Motley 1000
- Date
- March 4, 1977
- Numbers
- Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004583 – 004584; Motley 1000 no. 866
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 13063 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13063
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Memo, March 4, 1977 · 2 pages · 67 KB
What it shows
Marsh added that he had "never been very enthusiastic about using the results of the comparative fabric tests run at McGill for sales promotion purposes as it seems to me the argument is rather weak." He saw "no legal problems" with the letter but would check with Bob Sims. Two weeks earlier he had told another manager the same thing about the word "safe" (Marsh to M. Q. Scowcroft, February 1977). By 1977 the company's own environmental director was keeping the claim of safe use out of its sales letters.
In Johns-Manville's index
Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:
J.H. Marsh memo to J.E. Day, Jr., 3/4/77, entitled "Draft of Letter for Asbestos Textile Customers." Marsh comments on a draft letter by J.E. Day, Jr. to asbestos textile customers. Marsh states that he has eliminated the words "safely" and "safe" from the last paragraph of the draft, because "we must avoid the use of this word as a safe level of exposure has not been established." Marsh also states that he has "never been very enthusiastic about using the results of the comparative fabric tests run at McGill for sales promotion purposes as it seems to me the argument is rather weak." Marsh also states that he does not see any legal problems with the letter, but will discuss it with Bob Sims (R-M).
About this copy
This is document 866 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004583 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004584.
Cited on this site
Cite this document
“John H. Marsh to J. E. Day, Jr., on Striking "Safe" from a Letter to Asbestos Textile Customers.” March 4, 1977. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004583 – 004584, Motley 1000 no. 866. Raybestos-Manhattan. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13063. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13063.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.