You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A one-page Raybestos-Manhattan memo of February 16, 1977, from John H. Marsh, the company's director of environmental affairs, to M. Q. Scowcroft, on whether the company could say its products "can be used safely if properly handled." Marsh wrote: "we cannot use the word safe simply because we do not know what a safe level of exposure is." Science had not established a level "below which disease will not occur." He suggested instead telling customers that field tests showed its dust-suppressed textiles could be handled within OSHA limits with proper work practices.
- Author
- John H. Marsh
- Sent to
- M. Q. Scowcroft
- Published by
- Raybestos-Manhattan
- Series
- The Motley 1000
- Date
- February 16, 1977
- Numbers
- Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004575 – 004575; Motley 1000 no. 868
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 13065 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13065
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Memo, February 16, 1977 · 1 pages · 58 KB
What it shows
Marsh admitted such a statement "would probably be rather awkward and perhaps not very effective as a sales tool, but I don't see that we have much choice in the matter." He enclosed the company's brake-servicing instructions, noting "the word safe is avoided." Copies went to Dr. Hilton Lewinsohn and others. Two weeks later Marsh struck the same word from a draft letter to textile customers (Marsh to J. E. Day, Jr., March 1977).
In Johns-Manville's index
Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:
J.H. Marsh memo to M.Q. Scowcroft, 2/16/77. Marsh states that on several occasions a question has come up as to whether or not R-M can or should make statements to the effect that its products can be used safely if properly handled. Marsh objects to the word "safe" because it is not known what the safe level of exposure is. "Science has not yet been able to establish a level of exposure below which disease will not occur." Although Marsh objects to the use of the word "safe," he suggests that R-M develop some kind of language to indicate to customers that on the basis of field tests R-M has conducted, R-M dust suppressed textiles can be handled without exposing the worker to airborne concentrations in excess of OSHA standards providing proper work practices are observed.
About this copy
This is document 868 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004575 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004575.
Cited by Barry Castleman
In Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects (5th edition, 2005), which cites it in:
- Chapter 9 (Company Knowledge), p. 497
Cited on this site
Cite this document
“John H. Marsh to M. Q. Scowcroft on Why Raybestos-Manhattan Cannot Call Its Products Safe.” February 16, 1977. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-004575 – 004575, Motley 1000 no. 868. Raybestos-Manhattan. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13065. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13065.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.